This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dawson, L. A. Articles by Jaffray, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dawson, L. A. Articles by Jaffray, D. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Advances in Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Laura A. Dawson, David A. Jaffray

From the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Address reprint requests to Laura A. Dawson, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9; e-mail: laura.dawson{at}rmp.uhn.on.ca

Imaging is central to radiation oncology practice, with advances in radiation oncology occurring in parallel to advances in imaging. Targets to be irradiated and normal tissues to be spared are delineated on computed tomography (CT) scans in the planning process. Computer-assisted design of the radiation dose distribution ensures that the objectives for target coverage and avoidance of healthy tissue are achieved. The radiation treatment units are now recognized as state-of-the-art robotics capable of three-dimensional soft tissue imaging immediately before, during, or after radiation delivery, improving the localization of the target at the time of radiation delivery, to ensure that radiation therapy is delivered as planned. Frequent imaging in the treatment room during a course of radiation therapy, with decisions made on the basis of imaging, is referred to as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). IGRT allows changes in tumor position, size, and shape to be measured during the course of therapy, with adjustments made to maximize the geometric accuracy and precision of radiation delivery, reducing the volume of healthy tissue irradiated and permitting dose escalation to the tumor. These geometric advantages increase the chance of tumor control, reduce the risk of toxicity after radiotherapy, and facilitate the development of shorter radiotherapy schedules. By reducing the variability in delivered doses across a population of patients, IGRT should also improve interpretation of future clinical trials.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T KATO, Y OBATA, N KADOYA, and N FUWA A comparison of prone three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with supine intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: which technique is more effective for rectal sparing? Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2009; 82(980): 654 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Timmerman, C. S. Bizekis, H. I. Pass, Y. Fong, D. E. Dupuy, L. A. Dawson, and D. Lu Local Surgical, Ablative, and Radiation Treatment of Metastases CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2009; 59(3): 145 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Lee, J. J. Kim, R. Dinniwell, J. Brierley, G. Lockwood, R. Wong, B. Cummings, J. Ringash, R. V. Tse, J. J. Knox, et al. Phase I Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2009; 27(10): 1585 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Lawrence, N. J. Petrelli, B. D. Li, and J. M. Galvin Think Globally, Act Locally J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2007; 25(8): 921 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF]