Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 9 (March 20), 2007: pp. 1107-1113
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0183
Prospective Multicentric Randomized Phase III Study of Imatinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Comparing Interruption Versus Continuation of Treatment Beyond 1 Year: The French Sarcoma Group
Jean-Yves Blay,
Axel Le Cesne,
Isabelle Ray-Coquard,
Binh Bui,
Florence Duffaud,
Catherine Delbaldo,
Antoine Adenis,
Patrice Viens,
Maria Rios,
Emmanuelle Bompas,
Didier Cupissol,
Cecile Guillemet,
Pierre Kerbrat,
Jérome Fayette,
Sylvie Chabaud,
Patrice Berthaud,
David Perol
From the Unité INSERM U590 Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I & Hopital Edouard Herriot; Département de Médecine & UBET, Centre Léon Bérard; Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Hopital La Timone, Marseille; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy; Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes; Centre Val D'Aurelle Montpellier; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen; and Novartis Pharma, Rueil Malmaison, France
Address reprint requests to Jean-Yves Blay, MD, INSERM U590, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I & Unité d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France; e-mail: blay{at}lyon.fnclcc.fr; or Axel Le Cesne, MD, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; e-mail: lecesne@igr.fr
Purpose Imatinib is the standard treatment of advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs). It is not known whether imatinib may be stopped in patients in whom disease is controlled.
Methods This prospective, randomized, multicentric phase III study was designed to compare continuous (CONT) compared with interrupted (INT) imatinib beyond 1 year of treatment in patients with advanced GIST. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate after reinitiation of imatinib, and quality of life. Early stopping rules in cases of rapid progression of disease were defined, with preplanned interim analyses.
Results Between May 2002 and April 2004, 182 patients with advanced GIST were enrolled. Between May 2003 and April 2004, 98 patients in response or stable disease under imatinib reached more than 1 year of follow-up. Forty were not eligible for randomization, and 58 patients were randomly assigned, 32 and 26 patients in the INT and CONT arms, respectively. As of October 15, 2005, eight of 26 patients in the CONT group and 26 of 32 patients in the INT group had documented disease progression (P < .0001). Twenty-four of 26 patients with documented progression in the INT arm responded to imatinib reintroduction. No differences in overall survival or imatinib resistance were observed between the two arms. Quality of life evaluated 6 months after random assignment using the 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire was not significantly different between the two groups of randomly assigned patients.
Conclusion Imatinib interruption results in rapid progression in most patients with advanced GIST, and cannot be recommended in routine practice unless patient experience significant toxicity.
Supported by grant from the 2003 Emergence Fund of the French Institut National du Cancer (INCa) through the Canceropole CLARA, an unrestricted grant of the Comité de lAin de la Ligue Contre Le Cancer, a Grant from the Comité du Rhône de la Ligue Contre Le Cancer, the CONTICANET Network of Excellence of the sixth Framework Program of the European Commission.
J.-Y.B. and A.L.C. contributed equally to this work.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Le Cesne, M. Van Glabbeke, J. Verweij, P. G. Casali, M. Findlay, P. Reichardt, R. Issels, I. Judson, P. Schoffski, S. Leyvraz, et al.
Absence of Progression As Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Predicts Survival in Advanced GI Stromal Tumors Treated With Imatinib Mesylate: The Intergroup EORTC-ISG-AGITG Phase III Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 20, 2009;
27(24):
3969 - 3974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. Blay
Pharmacological management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an update on the role of sunitinib
Ann. Onc.,
August 12, 2009;
(2009)
mdp291v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mussi, U. Ronellenfitsch, J. Jakob, E. Tamborini, P. Reichardt, P. G. Casali, M. Fiore, P. Hohenberger, and A. Gronchi
Post-imatinib surgery in advanced/metastatic GIST: is it worthwhile in all patients?
Ann. Onc.,
July 23, 2009;
(2009)
mdp310v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. N. Sternberg
Expanding the boundaries of clinical practice: building on experience with targeted therapies
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_1):
i1 - i6.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. Blay
New paradigms in gastrointestinal stromal tumour management
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_1):
i18 - i24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Casali, L. Jost, P. Reichardt, M. Schlemmer, J.-Y. Blay, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_4):
iv64 - iv67.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Menard, J.-Y. Blay, C. Borg, S. Michiels, F. Ghiringhelli, C. Robert, C. Nonn, N. Chaput, J. Taieb, N. F. Delahaye, et al.
Natural Killer Cell IFN-{gamma} Levels Predict Long-term Survival with Imatinib Mesylate Therapy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-Bearing Patients
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2009;
69(8):
3563 - 3569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. Blay, H. El Sayadi, P. Thiesse, J. Garret, and I. Ray-Coquard
Complete response to imatinib in relapsing pigmented villonodular synovitis/tenosynovial giant cell tumor (PVNS/TGCT)
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2008;
19(4):
821 - 822.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cassier, A. Dufresne, and J.-Y. Blay
Controversies in the Adjuvant Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) with Imatinib
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
524 - 528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Solit, E. Santos, C. A. Pratilas, J. Lobo, M. Moroz, S. Cai, R. Blasberg, J. Sebolt-Leopold, S. Larson, and N. Rosen
3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography Is a Sensitive Method for Imaging the Response of BRAF-Dependent Tumors to MEK Inhibition
Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2007;
67(23):
11463 - 11469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|