Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 1 (January 1), 2008: pp. 121-126
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9247

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassouf, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kamat, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kassouf, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kamat, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lymph Node Density Is Superior to TNM Nodal Status in Predicting Disease-Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Pooled Data From MDACC and MSKCC

Wassim Kassouf, Piyush K. Agarwal, Harry W. Herr, Mark F. Munsell, Philippe E. Spiess, Gordon A. Brown, Louis Pisters, H. Barton Grossman, Colin P. Dinney, Ashish M. Kamat

From the Department of Urology and the Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and the Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Corresponding author: Ashish M. Kamat, MD, Department of Urology, Unit 1373, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: akamat{at}mdanderson.org

Purpose To compare the utility of lymph node density (LND) with TNM nodal status in predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) after radical cystectomy.

Patients and Methods We identified 248 patients with nodal metastasis after radical cystectomy (without neoadjuvant chemotherapy): 162 patients from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and 86 patients from M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). We assessed the effect of several variables on DSS.

Results After a median follow-up duration of 24 months, 134 patients died of their disease. The median DSS was 36 months, and the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year DSS rates were 83.7%, 57.4%, and 36.6%, respectively. The median LND was 20%. The 5-year DSS rate was 54.6% for patients with LND ≤ 20% v 15.3% for patients with LND higher than 20% (P < .01). Pathologic nodal (pN) status in patients was 78 for pN1 (32%), 127 for pN2 (51%), and 43 for pN3 (17%). On univariate analysis, pN status and LND were significant predictors of DSS (P < .01). However, when pN status and LND were considered jointly in a multivariate model, only LND higher than 20% predicted decreased DSS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.75; P < .01). In addition, while nonorgan-confined (ie, > pT2) primary tumor (HR, 2.40; P < .01) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.47; P < .01) were predictors of DSS, LND remained a predictor of DSS even after accounting for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion LND is superior to TNM nodal status in predicting DSS for patients with lymph node–positive disease after radical cystectomy, even in the context of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Supported by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Bladder SPORE (5P50CA091846-03) and a Department of Urology NIH T32 Training Grant CA079449.

W.K. and P.K.A. contributed equally to this work.

Presented at the 2007 Annual American Urological Association meeting, May 22, 2007, Anaheim, CA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. Thurairaja, U. E. Studer, and F. C. Burkhard
Indications, Extent, and Benefits of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Bladder and Prostate Cancer
Oncologist, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 40 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online