Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 1 (January 1), 2008: pp. 127-131
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.3223
Efficacy of Sunitinib and Sorafenib in Metastatic Papillary and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma
Toni K. Choueiri,
Anne Plantade,
Paul Elson,
Sylvie Negrier,
Alain Ravaud,
Stephane Oudard,
Ming Zhou,
Brian I. Rini,
Ronald M. Bukowski,
Bernard Escudier
From the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux; and Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
Corresponding author: Toni K. Choueiri, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney St, DANA 1230, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: Toni_Choueiri{at}dfci.harvard.edu
Purpose Sunitinib and sorafenib are novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that have shown significant clinical activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The activity of sunitinib and sorafenib in non–clear cell histologies has not been evaluated.
Patients and Methods Clinical features at study entry and treatment outcomes were evaluated in patients with metastatic papillary RCC (PRCC) and chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) who received either sunitinib or sorafenib as their initial TKI treatment in five US and French institutions. Response rate and survival were documented. Fisher's exact test was used for categoric variables, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival.
Results Fifty-three patients were included. The number of patients with papillary and chromophobe histologies was 41 (77%) and 12 (23%), respectively. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) time, and overall survival time for the entire cohort were 10%, 8.6 months, and 19.6 months, respectively. Three (25%) of 12 ChRCC patients achieved a response (two patients treated with sorafenib and one treated with sunitinib), and PFS was 10.6 months. Two (4.8%) of 41 PRCC patients achieved a response (both patients were treated with sunitinib). PFS for the whole cohort was 7.6 months. Sunitinib-treated PRCC patients had a PFS of 11.9 months compared with 5.1 months for sorafenib-treated patients (P < .001).
Conclusion Patients with PRCC and ChRCC may have prolonged PFS from sunitinib and sorafenib, although clinical responses remain overall low in PRCC. Additional prospective trials with these agents in non–clear cell RCC will further clarify their use in the future.
Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Correspondence
- Efficacy of Sunitinib and Sorafenib in Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From Expanded Access Studies
Dirk Strumberg
JCO 2008 26: 3469-3471
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M.G. Larkin, E. L.S. Kipps, C. J. Powell, and C. Swanton
Review: Systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
July 1, 2009;
1(1):
15 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. I. Rini
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Many Treatment Options, One Patient
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2009;
27(19):
3225 - 3234.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli, N. M. Tannir, E. Jonasch, S. F. Matin, C. G. Wood, and C. M. Sandler
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Spectrum of Disease
RadioGraphics,
May 1, 2009;
29(3):
741 - 754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Escudier, V. Kataja, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2009;
20(suppl_4):
iv81 - iv82.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S Pulido and S. Itty
Systemic antiangiogenic therapy: what goes around...
Br. J. Ophthalmol.,
April 1, 2009;
93(4):
420 - 421.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. M. Sun, L. Ngo, E. M. Genega, M. B. Atkins, M. E. Finn, N. M. Rofsky, and I. Pedrosa
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Differentiation of Tumor Subtypes--Correlation with Pathologic Findings
Radiology,
March 1, 2009;
250(3):
793 - 802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Tuthill, R. Barod, L. Pyle, T. Cook, S. Chew, M. Gore, P. Maxwell, and T. Eisen
A report of succinate dehydrogenase B deficiency associated with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: successful treatment with the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib
BMJ Case Reports,
February 16, 2009;
2009(feb04_1):
bcr0820080732 - bcr0820080732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mego, Z. Sycova-Mila, K. Rejlekova, B. Rychly, J. Obertova, J. Rajec, O. Hes, and J. Mardiak
Sunitinib in the treatment of tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney. A case report
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2008;
19(9):
1655 - 1656.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Strumberg
Efficacy of Sunitinib and Sorafenib in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From Expanded Access Studies
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2008;
26(20):
3469 - 3471.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. K. Choueiri, R. M. Bukowski, and B. Escudier
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 10, 2008;
26(20):
3471 - 3471.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. K. Rathmell, W. M. Stadler, and B. I. Rini
Rational Therapeutic Choices and Strategies for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cancer
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2008;
2008(1):
192 - 198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|