Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 16 (June 1), 2008: pp. 2674-2682
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9807

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lhommé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lhommé, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, M. H.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Study of Valspodar (PSC 833) Combined With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Compared With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Alone in Patients With Stage IV or Suboptimally Debulked Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Catherine Lhommé, Florence Joly, Joan L. Walker, Andrea A. Lissoni, Maria O. Nicoletto, Gregory M. Manikhas, Mark M.O. Baekelandt, Alan N. Gordon, Paula M. Fracasso, William L. Mietlowski, Gary J. Jones, Margaret H. Dugan

From the Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif Cedex; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Ospedale S. Gerardo-III Clinica Ginecologia, Monza; Ospedale Civile-Oncologia-Padova, Padova, Italy; St. Petersburg City Oncologic Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia; Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Arizona Gynecologic Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Corresponding author: Catherine Lhommé, MD, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Service de Gynécologie, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France; e-mail: lhomme{at}igr.fr

Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered with or without the multidrug resistance modulator valspodar (PSC 833) in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Patients and Methods Seven hundred sixty-two patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours for 12 doses, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (PC-PSC; n = 381) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 (PC; n = 381). Time to disease progression (TTP) was the primary end point. Secondary end points were overall survival time (OS), response rate (RR), safety, and tolerability.

Results With a median follow-up of 736 days (range, 1 to 2,280 days), the median TTP was 13.2 and 13.5 months in the PC-PSC and PC groups, respectively (P = .67); the median OS was 32 and 28.9 months, respectively (P = .94). The overall RR was higher in the PC group (41.5% v 33.6%; P = .02). Central and peripheral nervous system and GI toxicities were more common in the PC-PSC group. Ataxia occurred in 53.5% and 3.2% of PC-PSC–and PC-treated patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in the PC-PSC group. More PC-PSC–treated patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events (AEs), experienced serious AEs, and required paclitaxel dose reductions.

Conclusion The addition of valspodar to PC did not improve TTP or OS and was more toxic compared with PC in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Supported by Novartis Oncology, East Hanover, NJ.

Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 18-21, 2002, Orlando, FL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Reversal of Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: Where Do We Go From Here?
    Stan B. Kaye
    JCO 2008 26: 2616-2618 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. B. Kaye
Reversal of Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: Where Do We Go From Here?
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2616 - 2618.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online