|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 16 (June 1), 2008: pp. 2674-2682 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9807 Phase III Study of Valspodar (PSC 833) Combined With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Compared With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Alone in Patients With Stage IV or Suboptimally Debulked Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
From the Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif Cedex; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Ospedale S. Gerardo-III Clinica Ginecologia, Monza; Ospedale Civile-Oncologia-Padova, Padova, Italy; St. Petersburg City Oncologic Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia; Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Arizona Gynecologic Oncology, Phoenix, AZ; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ Corresponding author: Catherine Lhommé, MD, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Service de Gynécologie, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France; e-mail: lhomme{at}igr.fr Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered with or without the multidrug resistance modulator valspodar (PSC 833) in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and Methods Seven hundred sixty-two patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours for 12 doses, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (PC-PSC; n = 381) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 (PC; n = 381). Time to disease progression (TTP) was the primary end point. Secondary end points were overall survival time (OS), response rate (RR), safety, and tolerability. Results With a median follow-up of 736 days (range, 1 to 2,280 days), the median TTP was 13.2 and 13.5 months in the PC-PSC and PC groups, respectively (P = .67); the median OS was 32 and 28.9 months, respectively (P = .94). The overall RR was higher in the PC group (41.5% v 33.6%; P = .02). Central and peripheral nervous system and GI toxicities were more common in the PC-PSC group. Ataxia occurred in 53.5% and 3.2% of PC-PSC–and PC-treated patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in the PC-PSC group. More PC-PSC–treated patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events (AEs), experienced serious AEs, and required paclitaxel dose reductions. Conclusion The addition of valspodar to PC did not improve TTP or OS and was more toxic compared with PC in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. Supported by Novartis Oncology, East Hanover, NJ. Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 18-21, 2002, Orlando, FL. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|