This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dombernowsky, S. L. Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dombernowsky, S. L. Articles by Nordestgaard, B. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Genetics Home Reference Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Risk of Cancer by ATM Missense Mutations in the General Population

Sarah Louise Dombernowsky, Maren Weischer, Kristine Højgaard Allin, Stig Egil Bojesen, Anne Tybjjrg-Hansen, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard

From the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev; the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, and the Copenhagen City Heart Study, Bispebjerg University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Corresponding author: Børge G. Nordestgaard, MD, DMSc, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark; e-mail: brno{at}heh.regionh.dk

Purpose Truncating and missense mutations in the ATM gene, which cause insufficient DNA damage surveillance, allow damaged cells to proceed into mitosis, which eventually results in increased cancer susceptibility. We tested the hypotheses that ATM Ser49Cys and ATM Ser707Pro heterozygosity increase the risk of cancer overall, of breast cancer, and of 26 other cancer subtypes in the general population.

Patients and Methods We genotyped 10,324 individuals from the Danish general population who were observed prospectively for 36 years, during which 2,056 developed cancer.

Results Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for ATM Ser49Cys heterozygotes versus noncarriers were 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.5) for cancer overall, 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0) for breast cancer, 4.8 (95% CI, 2.2 to 11) for melanoma, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.0) for prostate cancer, and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 11) for cancer of the oral cavity/pharynx. Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for ATM Ser707Pro heterozygotes versus noncarriers were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2) for cancer overall, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2 to 1.6) for breast cancer, 10 (95% CI, 1.1 to 93) for thyroid/other endocrine tumors, and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.0 to 7.6) for cancer of corpus uteri.

Conclusion ATM missense mutations do not increase the risk of cancer overall or of breast cancer in the general population; however, we observed in exploratory analyses that ATM missense mutations may be associated with an increased risk of other cancer subtypes. As we did multiple comparisons, some of these findings could represent chance findings rather than real phenomena.

B.G.N. was supported by the Danish Medical Research Council, the Copenhagen County Foundation, and the Danish Heart Foundation.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Dombernowsky, M. Weischer, J. J. Freiberg, S. E. Bojesen, A. Tybjaerg-Hansen, and B. G. Nordestgaard Missense Polymorphisms in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2009; 18(8): 2339 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Thiers, R. E. Sahn, and J. P. Callen Cutaneous Manifestations of Internal Malignancy CA Cancer J Clin, March 3, 2009; (2009) caac.20005v1. [Abstract] [Full Text]