Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5986 on May 19 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 19 (July 1), 2008: pp. 3153-3158
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakha, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, I. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rakha, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, I. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prognostic Significance of Nottingham Histologic Grade in Invasive Breast Carcinoma

Emad A. Rakha, Maysa E. El-Sayed, Andrew H.S. Lee, Christopher W. Elston, Matthew J. Grainge, Zsolt Hodi, Roger W. Blamey, Ian O. Ellis

From the Department of Histopathology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Corresponding authors: Emad A. Rakha and Ian O. Ellis, MD, PhD, Molecular Medical Sciences, Department of Histopathology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham, NG5 1PB United Kingdom; e-mail: emadrakha{at}yahoo.com or ian.ellis{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Purpose The three strongest prognostic determinants in operable breast cancer used in routine clinical practice are lymph node (LN) stage, primary tumor size, and histologic grade. However, grade is not included in the recent revision of the TNM staging system of breast cancer as its value is questioned in certain settings.

Materials and Methods This study is based on a large and well-characterized consecutive series of operable breast cancer (2,219 cases), treated according to standard protocols in a single institution, with a long-term follow-up (median, 111 months) to assess the prognostic value of routine assessment of histologic grade using Nottingham histologic grading system.

Results Histologic grade is strongly associated with both breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the whole series as well as in different subgroups based on tumor size (pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, and pT2) and LN stages (pN0 and pN1 and pN2). Differences in survival were also noted between different individual grades (1, 2, and 3). Multivariate analyses showed that histologic grade is an independent predictor of both BCSS and DFS in operable breast cancer as a whole as well as in all studied subgroups.

Conclusion Histologic grade, as assessed by the Nottingham grading system, provides a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated in breast cancer staging systems.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on May 19, 2008.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. W. McGilvray, R. A. Eagle, N. F.S. Watson, A. Al-Attar, G. Ball, I. Jafferji, J. Trowsdale, and L. G. Durrant
NKG2D Ligand Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer Reveals Associations with Prognosis and Evidence for Immunoediting
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 15(22): 6993 - 7002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Frasci, G. D'Aiuto, P. Comella, M. D'Aiuto, M. Di Bonito, P. Ruffolo, G. Iodice, A. Petrillo, S. Lastoria, P. Oliviero, et al.
Preoperative weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (PET) improves prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer patients: an update of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) randomised trial 9908
Ann. Onc., October 8, 2009; (2009) mdp356v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Liedtke, C. Hatzis, W. F. Symmans, C. Desmedt, B. Haibe-Kains, V. Valero, H. Kuerer, G. N. Hortobagyi, M. Piccart-Gebhart, C. Sotiriou, et al.
Genomic Grade Index Is Associated With Response to Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): 3185 - 3191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Rakha, S. E. Elsheikh, M. A. Aleskandarany, H. O. Habashi, A. R. Green, D. G. Powe, M. E. El-Sayed, A. Benhasouna, J.-S. Brunet, L. A. Akslen, et al.
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Distinguishing between Basal and Nonbasal Subtypes
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 15(7): 2302 - 2310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online