Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4204 on May 19 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 19 (July 1), 2008: pp. 3166-3175
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarella, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rambaldi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarella, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rambaldi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey

Corrado Tarella, Manuela Zanni, Michele Magni, Fabio Benedetti, Caterina Patti, Tiziano Barbui, Alessandro Pileri, Mario Boccadoro, Fabio Ciceri, Andrea Gallamini, Sergio Cortelazzo, Ignazio Majolino, Salvo Mirto, Paolo Corradini, Roberto Passera, Giovanni Pizzolo, Alessandro M. Gianni, Alessandro Rambaldi

From the Dipartimento Medicina-Oncologia Sperimentale, Divisione Universitaria di Ematologia, and Divisione Universitaria di Medicina Nucleare, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni B., Torino; Divisione Universitaria di Oncologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori; Hematology Division and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Istituto Scientifico H.S. Raffaele; and Divisione di Ematologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Università di Milano, Milano; Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Sezione e Divisione di Ematologia, Università e Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona, Verona; Divisione Ospedaliera Ematologia, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo; Divisione Ospedaliera di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera V. Cervello, Palermo; Divisione di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce, Cuneo; Divisione di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maurizio, Bolzano; and Divisione di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo/Forlanini, Roma, Italy

Corresponding author: Corrado Tarella, MD, Divisione Universitaria di Ematologia, Az. Osp. S. Giovanni Battista, Via Genova 3, 10126 Torino, Italy; e-mail: corrado.tarella{at}unito.it

Purpose To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).

Patients and Methods Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R–) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R– and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease.

Results A total of 355 R– (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R– and 2.8% for R+ (P = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R– groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R– were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse.

Conclusion The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on May 19, 2008.

Supported in part by grants from the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; the Michelangelo Foundation for Advances in Cancer Research and Treatment; and the Piedmont Regional Government (Regione Piemonte).

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online