Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 20 (July 10), 2008: pp. 3351-3357
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0111
Increased EGFR Gene Copy Number Detected by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Predicts Outcome in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab and Chemotherapy
Fred R. Hirsch,
Roy S. Herbst,
Christine Olsen,
Kari Chansky,
John Crowley,
Karen Kelly,
Wilbur A. Franklin,
Paul A. Bunn, Jr,
Marileila Varella-Garcia,
David R. Gandara
From the Southwest Oncology Group, San Antonio; M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS; and the University of California Davis Cancer Center, Davis, CA
Corresponding author: Fred R. Hirsch, MD, PhD, University of Colorado Cancer Center, E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80010; e-mail: Fred.Hirsch{at}UCHSC.edu
Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has proven to be useful for selection of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we evaluate EGFR FISH as a predictive marker in NSCLC patients receiving the EGFR monoclonal antibody inhibitor cetuximab plus chemotherapy.
Patients and Methods Two hundred twenty-nine chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage NSCLC were enrolled onto a phase II selection trial evaluating sequential or concurrent chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin) with cetuximab.
Results EGFR FISH was assessable in 76 patients with available tumor tissue and classified as positive (four or more gene copies per cell in 40% of the cells or gene amplification) in 59.2%. Response (complete response/partial response) was numerically higher in FISH-positive (45%) versus FISH-negative (26%) patients (P = .14), whereas disease control rate (complete response/partial response plus stable disease) was statistically superior (81% v 55%, respectively; P = .02). Patients with FISH-positive tumors had a median progression-free survival time of 6 months compared with 3 months for FISH-negative patients (P = .0008). Median survival time was 15 months for the FISH-positive group compared with 7 months for patients who were FISH negative. (P = .04). Furthermore, survival favored FISH-positive patients receiving concurrent therapy.
Conclusion These results are the first to suggest that EGFR FISH is a predictive factor for selection of NSCLC patients for cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.
Supported by the National Cancer Institute Specialized Program for Research Excellence (SPORE) in Lung Cancer Grant No. P50 CA 058187 and the Cancer Center Core Grant No. P30 CA 046934 to the University of Colorado Health Science Center and by Grants No. CA38926 and CA32102 to the Southwest Oncology Group.
Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Article
- Can Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization Predict Clinical Benefit From Cetuximab Treatment in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer?
Toshimi Takano, Shuji Ota, Akiko Hori, Nobuhiko Seki, and Kenji Eguchi
JCO 2009 27: 464-465
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Peled, K. Yoshida, M. W. Wynes, and F. R. Hirsch
Review: Predictive and prognostic markers for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
November 1, 2009;
1(3):
137 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Varella-Garcia, J Diebold, D A Eberhard, K Geenen, A Hirschmann, M Kockx, I Nagelmeier, J Ruschoff, M Schmitt, S Arbogast, et al.
EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay: guidelines for application to non-small-cell lung cancer
J. Clin. Pathol.,
November 1, 2009;
62(11):
970 - 977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Neyns, J. Sadones, E. Joosens, F. Bouttens, L. Verbeke, J.-F. Baurain, L. D'Hondt, T. Strauven, C. Chaskis, P. In't Veld, et al.
Stratified phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2009;
20(9):
1596 - 1603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Horn and A. Sandler
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Agents for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2009;
15(16):
5040 - 5048.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Socinski, M. N. Saleh, D. F. Trent, T. W. Dobbs, L. M. Zehngebot, M. A. Levine, R. Bordoni, and P. J. Stella
A randomized, phase II trial of two dose schedules of carboplatin/paclitaxel/cetuximab in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2009;
20(6):
1068 - 1073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Freeman, T. Bush, S. Ogbagabriel, B. Belmontes, T. Juan, C. Plewa, G. Van, C. Johnson, and R. Radinsky
Activity of panitumumab alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines expressing mutant epidermal growth factor receptor
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
June 1, 2009;
8(6):
1536 - 1546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gridelli, P. Maione, M. L. Ferrara, and A. Rossi
Cetuximab and Other Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Oncologist,
June 1, 2009;
14(6):
601 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Natrajan, M. B. Lambros, S. M. Rodriguez-Pinilla, G. Moreno-Bueno, D. S.P. Tan, C. Marchio, R. Vatcheva, S. Rayter, B. Mahler-Araujo, L. G. Fulford, et al.
Tiling Path Genomic Profiling of Grade 3 Invasive Ductal Breast Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2009;
15(8):
2711 - 2722.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cappuzzo, A. Marchetti, M. Skokan, E. Rossi, S. Gajapathy, L. Felicioni, M. del Grammastro, M. G. Sciarrotta, F. Buttitta, M. Incarbone, et al.
Increased MET Gene Copy Number Negatively Affects Survival of Surgically Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2009;
27(10):
1667 - 1674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Nikolova, I. A. Asangani, L. D. Nelson, D. P.M. Hughes, D. R. Siwak, G. B. Mills, A. Harms, E. Buchholz, L. R. Pilz, C. Manegold, et al.
Cetuximab Attenuates Metastasis and u-PAR Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: u-PAR and E-Cadherin are Novel Biomarkers of Cetuximab Sensitivity
Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2009;
69(6):
2461 - 2470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Schittenhelm, C. Kollmannsberger, K. Oechsle, A. Harlow, J. Morich, F. Honecker, R. Kurek, S. Storkel, L. Kanz, C. L. Corless, et al.
Molecular determinants of response to matuzumab in combination with paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
March 1, 2009;
8(3):
481 - 489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Takano, S. Ota, A. Hori, N. Seki, and K. Eguchi
Can Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization Predict Clinical Benefit From Cetuximab Treatment in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2009;
27(3):
464 - 465.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Hirsch, R. S. Herbst, C. Olsen, K. Chansky, J. Crowley, K. Kelly, W. A. Franklin, P. A. Bunn Jr, M. Varella-Garcia, and D. R. Gandara
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2009;
27(3):
465 - 467.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Socinski
What Guides Decisions about the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody or Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
436 - 443.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Herbst, J. V. Heymach, and S. M. Lippman
Lung Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
September 25, 2008;
359(13):
1367 - 1380.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|