|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 22 (August 1), 2008: pp. 3695-3701 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6240 Clinical Benefit and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Versus Gemcitabine Alone: A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial—SAKK 44/00–CECOG/PAN.1.3.001
From the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Coordinating Center, Bern; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern; Kantonsspital, St Gallen; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudoise, Lausanne; Universitätsspital, Zurich; University Hospital, Basel; Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland; Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Wien, Austria; Szt László Hospital, Budapest, Hungary; University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv; Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; and Universitätsklinikum, Dresden, Germany Corresponding author: Jürg Bernhard, PhD, International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordinating Center, Effingerstr 40, 3008 Bern, Switzerland; e-mail: juerg.bernhard{at}ibcsg.org Purpose To compare clinical benefit response (CBR) and quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (Cap) versus single-agent Gem for advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral Cap 650 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 through 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2 in a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2 in a 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks or until progression. CBR criteria and QOL indicators were assessed over this period. CBR was defined as improvement from baseline for Results Of 319 patients, 19% treated with GemCap and 20% treated with Gem experienced a CBR, with a median duration of 9.5 and 6.5 weeks, respectively (P < .02); 54% of patients treated with GemCap and 60% treated with Gem had no CBR (remaining patients were not assessable). There was no treatment difference in QOL (n = 311). QOL indicators were improving under chemotherapy (P < .05). These changes differed by the time to failure, with a worsening 1 to 2 months before treatment failure (all P < .05). Conclusion There is no indication of a difference in CBR or QOL between GemCap and Gem. Regardless of their initial condition, some patients experience an improvement in QOL on chemotherapy, followed by a worsening before treatment failure. Supported by Roche Pharma Switzerland, Eli Lilly Switzerland, and the Swiss Federal Government. Presented at the 9th World Conference of Psycho-Oncology, September 16-20, 2007, London, United Kingdom. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|