This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McNiff, K. K. Articles by Simone, J. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McNiff, K. K. Articles by Simone, J. V. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Measuring Supportive Care in Medical Oncology Practice: Lessons Learned From the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative

Kristen K. McNiff, Michael N. Neuss, Joseph O. Jacobson, Peter D. Eisenberg, Pamela Kadlubek, Joseph V. Simone

From the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Oncology/Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH; North Shore Medical Center, Salem, MA; California Cancer Care, Greenbrae, CA; and Simone Consulting, Atlanta, GA

Corresponding author: Kristen McNiff, American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2318 Mill Road, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314; e-mail: mcniffk{at}asco.org

We provide a brief review of the use of quality measures to assess supportive care in the medical oncology office. Specifically, we discuss the development and implementation of supportive care measures in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI), a voluntary quality measurement and improvement program of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. QOPI has demonstrated that medical oncologists voluntarily engage in self-assessment and often select measures related to supportive care for measurement and improvement. Results to date have demonstrated that there is room for improvement in this domain. Because supportive care measures appropriate for use through structured chart review in the outpatient oncology setting are not generally available in the published literature, measures have been developed and tested through the program. Additional measures are in development for implementation in QOPI in 2008.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. K. McNiff, K. R. Bonelli, and J. O. Jacobson Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Certification Program: Overview, Measure Scoring Methodology, and Site Assessment Standards J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2009; 5(6): 270 - 276. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Schneider Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Crossroads or Convergence? J. Oncol. Pract, November 1, 2009; 5(6): 284 - 286. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bakitas, K. D. Lyons, M. T. Hegel, S. Balan, F. C. Brokaw, J. Seville, J. G. Hull, Z. Li, T. D. Tosteson, I. R. Byock, et al. Effects of a Palliative Care Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Cancer: The Project ENABLE II Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, August 19, 2009; 302(7): 741 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hashimoto, K. Yonemori, N. Katsumata, M. Hotchi, T. Kouno, C. Shimizu, K. Tamura, M. Ando, M. Takeuchi, and Y. Fujiwara Factors That Affect the Duration of the Interval Between the Completion of Palliative Chemotherapy and Death Oncologist, July 1, 2009; 14(7): 752 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]