|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 26 (September 10), 2008: pp. 4253-4260 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0672 Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (INVITE): A Randomized, Phase II Study
From the Department of Medical Oncology, Perugia Hospital, Perugia; and Instituto Clinico Humanitas Istituto di Recovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rozzano, Italy; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Faculty Hospital Bulovka and Postgraduate Medical Institute, Prague; and Charles University Medical Faculty, Plzen, Czech Republic; Hospital Grobhansdorf, Groβhansdorf, Germany; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham; Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; and AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO Corresponding author: Lucio Crinò, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Perugia Hospital, S Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy; e-mail: lcrino{at}unipg.it Purpose This phase II, open-label, parallel-group study compared gefitinib with vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naïve elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients (age Results Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (n = 97) or to vinorelbine (n = 99). Hazard ratios (HR; gefitinib v vinorelbine) were 1.19 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.65) for PFS and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.47) for OS. ORR and disease control rates were 3.1% (95% CI, 0.6 to 8.8) and 43.3% (for gefitinib) and 5.1% (95% CI, 1.7 to 11.4) and 53.5% (for vinorelbine), respectively. Overall QOL improvement and PSI rates were 24.3% and 36.6% (for gefitinib) and 10.9% and 31.0% (for vinorelbine), respectively. In the 54 patients who were EGFR FISH-positive, HRs were 3.13 (95% CI, 1.45 to 6.76) for PFS and 2.88 (95% CI, 1.21 to 6.83) for OS. There were fewer treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events with gefitinib (12.8%) than with vinorelbine (41.7%). Conclusion There was no statistical difference between gefitinib and vinorelbine in efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve, unselected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, but there was better tolerability with gefitinib. Individuals who were EGFR FISH-positive benefited more from vinorelbine than from gefitinib; this unexpected finding requires further study. Supported by AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom. Presented in part at the 5th International Symposium on Targeted Anticancer Therapies, March 8-10, 2007, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and at the 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, September 2-6, 2007, Seoul, Korea. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00256711 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|