Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 26 (September 10), 2008: pp. 4253-4260
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0672

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crinò, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crinò, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gefitinib Versus Vinorelbine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (INVITE): A Randomized, Phase II Study

Lucio Crinò, Federico Cappuzzo, Petr Zatloukal, Martin Reck, Milos Pesek, Joyce C. Thompson, Hugo E.R. Ford, Fred R. Hirsch, Marileila Varella-Garcia, Serban Ghiorghiu, Emma L. Duffield, Alison A. Armour, Georgina Speake, Michael Cullen

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Perugia Hospital, Perugia; and Instituto Clinico Humanitas Istituto di Recovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rozzano, Italy; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Faculty Hospital Bulovka and Postgraduate Medical Institute, Prague; and Charles University Medical Faculty, Plzen, Czech Republic; Hospital Grobhansdorf, Groβhansdorf, Germany; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham; Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; and AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

Corresponding author: Lucio Crinò, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, Perugia Hospital, S Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy; e-mail: lcrino{at}unipg.it

Purpose This phase II, open-label, parallel-group study compared gefitinib with vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naïve elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients (age ≥ 70 years) were randomly assigned to gefitinib (250 mg/d orally) or vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL), pulmonary symptom improvement (PSI), and tolerability. Exploratory end points included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (n = 97) or to vinorelbine (n = 99). Hazard ratios (HR; gefitinib v vinorelbine) were 1.19 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.65) for PFS and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.47) for OS. ORR and disease control rates were 3.1% (95% CI, 0.6 to 8.8) and 43.3% (for gefitinib) and 5.1% (95% CI, 1.7 to 11.4) and 53.5% (for vinorelbine), respectively. Overall QOL improvement and PSI rates were 24.3% and 36.6% (for gefitinib) and 10.9% and 31.0% (for vinorelbine), respectively. In the 54 patients who were EGFR FISH-positive, HRs were 3.13 (95% CI, 1.45 to 6.76) for PFS and 2.88 (95% CI, 1.21 to 6.83) for OS. There were fewer treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events with gefitinib (12.8%) than with vinorelbine (41.7%).

Conclusion There was no statistical difference between gefitinib and vinorelbine in efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve, unselected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, but there was better tolerability with gefitinib. Individuals who were EGFR FISH-positive benefited more from vinorelbine than from gefitinib; this unexpected finding requires further study.

Supported by AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom.

Presented in part at the 5th International Symposium on Targeted Anticancer Therapies, March 8-10, 2007, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and at the 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, September 2-6, 2007, Seoul, Korea.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00256711 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M Varella-Garcia, J Diebold, D A Eberhard, K Geenen, A Hirschmann, M Kockx, I Nagelmeier, J Ruschoff, M Schmitt, S Arbogast, et al.
EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay: guidelines for application to non-small-cell lung cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2009; 62(11): 970 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. G. Pallis, C. Gridelli, J. P. van Meerbeeck, L. Greillier, U. Wedding, D. Lacombe, J. Welch, C. P. Belani, and M. Aapro
EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population
Ann. Onc., August 28, 2009; (2009) mdp360v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
M. C. GARASSINO, K. BORGONOVO, A. ROSSI, A. MANCUSO, O. MARTELLI, A. TINAZZI, S. DI COSIMO, N. LA VERDE, P. SBURLATI, C. BIANCHI, et al.
Biological and Clinical Features in Predicting Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Anticancer Res, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 2691 - 2701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
C. Gridelli, P. Maione, and A. Rossi
Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Older Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 283 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
M. A. Socinski
What Guides Decisions about the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody or Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. C. Kane
The Clinical Significance of Statistical Significance
Oncologist, November 1, 2008; 13(11): 1129 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. E. Dahlberg, R. J. Gray, and B. E. Johnson
Gefitinib for Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: All Things Are Not Created Equal
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4233 - 4235.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online