Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8924 on July 14 2008
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 26 (September 10), 2008: pp. 4268-4275
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Role of KRAS and EGFR As Biomarkers of Response to Erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21
Chang-Qi Zhu,
Gilda da Cunha Santos,
Keyue Ding,
Akira Sakurada,
Jean-Claude Cutz,
Ni Liu,
Tong Zhang,
Paula Marrano,
Marlo Whitehead,
Jeremy A. Squire,
Suzanne Kamel-Reid,
Lesley Seymour,
Frances A. Shepherd,
Ming-Sound Tsao
From the Division of Applied Molecular Oncology and Departments of Pathology and Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital; Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Medical Biophysics, and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto; and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author: Ming-Sound Tsao, MD, FRCPC, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9; e-mail: Ming.Tsao{at}uhn.on.ca
Purpose To evaluate the effect of KRAS and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotype on the response to erlotinib treatment in the BR.21, placebo-controlled trial.
Patients and Methods We analyzed 206 tumors for KRAS mutation, 204 tumors for EGFR mutation, and 159 tumors for EGFR gene copy by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We reanalyzed EGFR deletion/mutation using two highly sensitive techniques that detect abnormalities in samples with 5% to 10% tumor cellularity. KRAS mutation was analyzed by direct sequencing.
Results Thirty patients (15%) had KRAS mutations, 34 (17%) had EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutations, and 61 (38%) had high EGFR gene copy (FISH positive). Response rates were 10% for wild-type and 5% for mutant KRAS (P = .69), 7% for wild-type and 27% for mutant EGFR (P = .03), and 5% for EGFR FISH-negative and 21% for FISH-positive patients (P = .02). Significant survival benefit from erlotinib therapy was observed for patients with wild-type KRAS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, P = .03) and EGFR FISH positivity (HR = 0.43, P = .004) but not for patients with mutant KRAS (HR = 1.67, P = .31), wild-type EGFR (HR = 0.74, P = .09), mutant EGFR (HR = 0.55, P = .12), and EGFR FISH negativity (HR = 0.80, P = .35). In multivariate analysis, only EGFR FISH-positive status was prognostic for poorer survival (P = .025) and predictive of differential survival benefit from erlotinib (P = .005).
Conclusion EGFR mutations and high copy number are predictive of response to erlotinib. EGFR FISH is the strongest prognostic marker and a significant predictive marker of differential survival benefit from erlotinib.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on July 14, 2008.
Supported by grants from the Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, the Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada, the Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research, and OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
C.-Q.Z., G.d.C.S., and K.D. contributed equally to this study.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Leidner, P. Fu, B. Clifford, A. Hamdan, C. Jin, R. Eisenberg, T. J. Boggon, M. Skokan, W. A. Franklin, F. Cappuzzo, et al.
Genetic Abnormalities of the EGFR Pathway in African American Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2009;
27(33):
5620 - 5626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Peled, K. Yoshida, M. W. Wynes, and F. R. Hirsch
Review: Predictive and prognostic markers for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
November 1, 2009;
1(3):
137 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Varella-Garcia, J Diebold, D A Eberhard, K Geenen, A Hirschmann, M Kockx, I Nagelmeier, J Ruschoff, M Schmitt, S Arbogast, et al.
EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay: guidelines for application to non-small-cell lung cancer
J. Clin. Pathol.,
November 1, 2009;
62(11):
970 - 977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. S. Mok, Y.-L. Wu, S. Thongprasert, C.-H. Yang, D.-T. Chu, N. Saijo, P. Sunpaweravong, B. Han, B. Margono, Y. Ichinose, et al.
Gefitinib or Carboplatin-Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
N. Engl. J. Med.,
September 3, 2009;
361(10):
947 - 957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. N. William Jr, K. A. Gold, and E. S. Kim
Gefitinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and quality of life: expanding and improving treatment options
Ann. Onc.,
September 1, 2009;
20(9):
1455 - 1457.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Horn and A. Sandler
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Agents for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2009;
15(16):
5040 - 5048.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Schmid, N. Oehl, F. Wrba, R. Pirker, C. Pirker, and M. Filipits
EGFR/KRAS/BRAF Mutations in Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas and Corresponding Locoregional Lymph Node Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2009;
15(14):
4554 - 4560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Brambilla and A. Gazdar
Pathogenesis of lung cancer signalling pathways: roadmap for therapies
Eur. Respir. J.,
June 1, 2009;
33(6):
1485 - 1497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. B. Rickman, P. K. Vohra, B. Sanyal, J. A. Vrana, M.-C. Aubry, D. A. Wigle, and C. F. Thomas Jr.
Analysis of ErbB Receptors in Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2009;
15(10):
3315 - 3324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Hudson
Personalized medicine: A transformative approach is needed
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
April 28, 2009;
180(9):
911 - 913.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cappuzzo, A. Marchetti, M. Skokan, E. Rossi, S. Gajapathy, L. Felicioni, M. del Grammastro, M. G. Sciarrotta, F. Buttitta, M. Incarbone, et al.
Increased MET Gene Copy Number Negatively Affects Survival of Surgically Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2009;
27(10):
1667 - 1674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V Martin, L Mazzucchelli, and M Frattini
An overview of the epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation challenge in tumour pathology
J. Clin. Pathol.,
April 1, 2009;
62(4):
314 - 324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gandhi, K. L. McNamara, D. Li, C. L. Borgman, U. McDermott, K. A. Brandstetter, R. F. Padera, L. R. Chirieac, J. E. Settleman, and K.-K. Wong
Sunitinib Prolongs Survival in Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Multistep Lung Carcinogenesis
Cancer Prevention Research,
April 1, 2009;
2(4):
330 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Langer
The "Lazarus Response" in Treatment-Naive, Poor Performance Status Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 20, 2009;
27(9):
1350 - 1354.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Schittenhelm, C. Kollmannsberger, K. Oechsle, A. Harlow, J. Morich, F. Honecker, R. Kurek, S. Storkel, L. Kanz, C. L. Corless, et al.
Molecular determinants of response to matuzumab in combination with paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
March 1, 2009;
8(3):
481 - 489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Hirsch, R. S. Herbst, C. Olsen, K. Chansky, J. Crowley, K. Kelly, W. A. Franklin, P. A. Bunn Jr, M. Varella-Garcia, and D. R. Gandara
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 20, 2009;
27(3):
465 - 467.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Riely and M. Ladanyi
KRAS Mutations: An Old Oncogene Becomes a New Predictive Biomarker
J. Mol. Diagn.,
November 1, 2008;
10(6):
493 - 495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|