|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2058 on June 16 2008 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Wilms Tumor 1 Gene Mutations Independently Predict Poor Outcome in Adults With Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study
From the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine; and Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Pathology; The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; and Section on Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; and Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Corresponding author: Clara D. Bloomfield, MD, Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, 519 James Cancer Hospital, 300 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail: clara.bloomfield{at}osumc.edu Purpose To analyze the prognostic impact of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). Patients and Methods We studied 196 adults younger than 60 years with newly diagnosed primary CN-AML, who were treated similarly on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols 9621 and 19808, for WT1 mutations in exons 7 and 9. The patients also were assessed for the presence of FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD), FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations (FLT3-TKD), MLL partial tandem duplications (MLL-PTD), NPM1 and CEBPA mutations, and for the expression levels of ERG and BAALC. Results Twenty-one patients (10.7%) harbored WT1 mutations. Complete remission rates were not significantly different between patients with WT1 mutations and those with unmutated WT1 (P = .36; 76% v 84%). Patients with WT1 mutations had worse disease-free survival (DFS; P < .001; 3-year rates, 13% v 50%) and overall survival (OS; P < .001; 3-year rates, 10% v 56%) than patients with unmutated WT1. In multivariable analyses, WT1 mutations independently predicted worse DFS (P = .009; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7) when controlling for CEBPA mutational status, ERG expression level, and FLT3-ITD/NPM1 molecular-risk group (ie, FLT3-ITDnegative/NPM1mutated as low risk v FLT3-ITDpositive and/or NPM1wild-type as high risk). WT1 mutations also independently predicted worse OS (P < .001; HR = 3.2) when controlling for CEBPA mutational status, FLT3-ITD/NPM1 molecular-risk group, and white blood cell count. Conclusion We report the first evidence that WT1 mutations independently predict extremely poor outcome in intensively treated, younger patients with CN-AML. Future trials should include testing for WT1 mutations as part of molecularly based risk assessment and risk-adapted treatment stratification of patients with CN-AML. published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on June 16, 2008. Supported in part by Grants No. CA77658, CA101140, CA114725, CA31946, CA33601, and CA16058 from National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD and by the Coleman Leukemia Research Foundation. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Related Article
Related Editorial
Related Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|