Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6356 on June 23 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 28 (October 1), 2008: pp. 4626-4633
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilimoria, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilimoria, K. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, C. Y.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer Surgery

Karl Y. Bilimoria, David J. Bentrem, Joseph M. Feinglass, Andrew K. Stewart, David P. Winchester, Mark S. Talamonti, Clifford Y. Ko

From the Department of Surgery; Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Cancer Programs, American College Surgeons, Chicago; Department of Surgery, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles; and VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA

Corresponding author: Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS, Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, 633 N St Clair St, 25th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: k-bilimoria{at}northwestern.edu

Purpose Quality-improvement initiatives are being developed to decrease volume-based variability in surgical outcomes. Resources for national and hospital quality-improvement initiatives are limited. It is unclear whether quality initiatives in surgical oncology should focus on factors affecting perioperative mortality or long-term survival. Our objective was to determine whether differences in hospital surgical volume have a larger effect on perioperative mortality or long-term survival using two methods.

Patients and Methods From the National Cancer Data Base, 243,103 patients who underwent surgery for nonmetastatic colon, esophageal, gastric, liver, lung, pancreatic, or rectal cancer were identified. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate 60-day mortality and 5-year conditional survival (excluding perioperative deaths) across hospital volume strata. The number of potentially avoidable perioperative and long-term deaths were calculated if outcomes at low-volume hospitals were improved to those of the highest-volume hospitals.

Results Risk-adjusted perioperative mortality and long-term conditional survival worsened as hospital surgical volume decreased for all cancer sites, except for liver resections where there was no difference in survival. When comparing low- with high-volume hospitals, the hazard ratios for perioperative mortality were substantially larger than for long-term survival. However, the number of potentially avoidable deaths each year in the United States, if outcomes at low-volume hospitals were improved to the level of highest-volume centers, was significantly larger for long-term survival.

Conclusion Although the magnitude of the hazard ratios implies that quality-improvement efforts should focus on perioperative mortality, a larger number of deaths could be avoided by focusing quality initiatives on factors associated with long-term survival.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on June 23, 2008.

Supported by the American College of Surgeons, Clinical Scholars in Residence program and a research fellowship from the Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University (both to K.Y.B.); and American Cancer Society Grant No. ACS IRG 93-037-12 (D.B.).

Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 13-16, 2008 Chicago, IL.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Not Just Another Article on Cancer Surgery Volume and Patient Outcomes
    Nicholas J. Petrelli
    JCO 2008 26: 4530-4531 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. M. B. van Tilburg, H. Stam, H. C. Hoogsteden, and R. J. van Klaveren
Pre-operative pulmonary evaluation of lung cancer patients: a review of the literature
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2009; 33(5): 1206 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. J. Petrelli
Not Just Another Article on Cancer Surgery Volume and Patient Outcomes
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2008; 26(28): 4530 - 4531.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online