Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 3 (January 20), 2008: pp. 368-373
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5434

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guillem, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pucciarelli, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guillem, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pucciarelli, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

cT3N0 Rectal Cancer: Potential Overtreatment With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Is Warranted

José G. Guillem, Juan A. Díaz-González, Bruce D. Minsky, Vincenzo Valentini, Seung-Yong Jeong, Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas, Claudio Coco, Rebecca Leon, José L. Hernandez-Lizoain, José J. Aristu, Elyn R. Riedel, Donato Nitti, W. Douglas Wong, Salvatore Pucciarelli

From the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Clinica Universitaria, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; University of the Sacred Heart, Rome; University of Padua, Padua, Italy; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; and The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Corresponding author: José G. Guillem, MD, MPH, Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room C-1077, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: guillemj{at}mskcc.org

Purpose Although combined-modality therapy (CMT) is the preferred treatment for T3 and/or lymph node (LN)-positive rectal cancer, the German rectal cancer study published in 2004 demonstrated that 18% of patients deemed suitable for preoperative CMT by endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) may be overstaged. Because data also suggest that LN-negative rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision may not require radiotherapy, it is reasonable to consider omitting radiotherapy for the cT3N0 subset. We therefore determined the accuracy of pre-CMT ERUS or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging, to explore the validity of a nonpreoperative CMT approach for cT3N0 disease.

Patients and Methods One hundred eighty-eight ERUS-/MRI-staged T3N0 rectal cancer patients received preoperative CMT (fluorouracil based and 45-50.4 Gy) followed by radical resection. Rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and mesorectal LN involvement were determined.

Results Tumors were located a median of 5 cm from the anal verge. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 143 patients (76%). Overall pCR was 20%, and 41 patients (22%) had pathologically positive mesorectal LNs. The incidence of positive LNs significantly increased with T stage: ypT0, 3%; ypT1, 7%; ypT2, 20%; ypT3-4, 36% (P = .001).

Conclusion The accuracy of preoperative ERUS/MRI for staging mid to distal cT3N0 rectal cancer is limited because 22% of patients have undetected mesorectal LN involvement despite CMT. Therefore, ERUS-/MRI-staged T3N0 rectal cancer patients should continue to receive preoperative CMT. Although 18% may be overstaged and therefore overtreated, our data suggest that an even larger number would be understaged and require postoperative CMT, which is associated with significantly inferior local control, higher toxicity, and worse functional outcome.

J.G.G. and J.A.D.-G. contributed equally to this work.

Presented in poster format at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 2-6, 2006, Atlanta, GA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Rectal Cancer at the Crossroads: The Dilemma of Clinically Staged T3, N0, M0 Disease
    Lisa A. Kachnic, Theodore S. Hong, and David P. Ryan
    JCO 2008 26: 350-351 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
B. D. Minsky
Preoperative Treatment for Upper cT3 N0 Rectal Tumors: Is It Required?
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 204 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Borschitz
In Reply: Local Excision as an Optional Tool to Individualize Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 15(9): 2630 - 2631.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. A. Kachnic, T. S. Hong, and D. P. Ryan
Rectal Cancer at the Crossroads: The Dilemma of Clinically Staged T3, N0, M0 Disease
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 350 - 351.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online