Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 3 (January 20), 2008: pp. 421-427
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8461

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Culine, S.
Right arrow Articles by Droz, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Culine, S.
Right arrow Articles by Droz, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Trial Comparing Bleomycin/Etoposide/Cisplatin With Alternating Cisplatin/Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin and Vinblastine/Bleomycin Regimens of Chemotherapy for Patients With Intermediate- and Poor-Risk Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Genito-Urinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers Trial T93MP

Stéphane Culine, Andrew Kramar, Christine Théodore, Lionel Geoffrois, Christine Chevreau, Pierre Biron, Binh Bui Nguyen, Jean-François Héron, Pierre Kerbrat, Armelle Caty, Rémy Delva, Pierre Fargeot, Karim Fizazi, Jeannine Bouzy, Jean-Pierre Droz

From the Centre Regional de Lutte contre le Cancer Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy; Institut Claudius Régaud, Toulouse; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Centre François Baclesse, Caen; Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille; Centre Eugène Papin, Angers; and the Centre Georges François, Leclerc, France

Corresponding author: Stéphane Culine, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Parc Euromédecine, 34298 - Montpellier Cedex 5, France; e-mail: stculine{at}valdorel.fnclcc.fr

Purpose Two chemotherapy regimens for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were compared for efficacy and toxicity.

Patients and Methods From February 1994 to February 2000, 190 patients were randomly assigned between either four cycles of BEP (bleomycin 30 mg d1, d8, d15; etoposide 100 mg/m2 d1-5; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 d1-5) or four to six alternating cycles of CISCA/VB (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 d1-2, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 d1-2, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 d3/vinblastine 2.5 mg/m2 d1-5, bleomycin 25 mg/m2 d1-5). Risk was initially defined according to the Institut Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France) prognostic model based on serum alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin levels only. Patients were retrospectively assigned into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification.

Results Among 185 assessable patients, favorable responses did not differ statistically between the two arms: 49 in the CISCA/VB arm (56%; 95% CI, 45% to 66%), 57 in the BEP arm (65%; 95% CI, 55% to 75%). The CISCA/VB regimen induced more significant hematologic and mucous toxicities compared with the BEP arm. The 5-year event-free survival rates were 37% (95% CI, 27% to 47%) and 47% (95% CI, 37% to 57%) in CISCA/VB and BEP arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.11; P = .15). With a median follow-up of 7.8 years, the 5-year overall survival rates were 59% (95% CI, 47% to 67%) and 69% (95% CI, 58% to 77%) in CISCA/VB and BEP arms, respectively (HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.18; P = .24).

Conclusion Because of equivalent efficacy and lesser toxicity, the standard treatment for patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors remains four cycles of BEP.

Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 12-15, 2001, San Francisco, CA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Chemotherapy for Patients with Intermediate- and Poor-Risk Germ-Cell Tumors
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, February 12, 2008; 2008(212): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online