Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3138 on October 20 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 33 (November 20), 2008: pp. 5407-5415
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heymach, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heymach, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Phase II Study of Vandetanib Alone or With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

John V. Heymach, Luis Paz-Ares, Filippo De Braud, Martin Sebastian, David J. Stewart, Wilfried E.E. Eberhardt, Anantbhushan A. Ranade, Graham Cohen, Jose Manuel Trigo, Alan B. Sandler, Philip D. Bonomi, Roy S. Herbst, Annetta D. Krebs, James Vasselli, Bruce E. Johnson

From the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid; Hospital Clínico Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain; European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Universität Mainz III Med. Klinik, Mainz, Germany; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Universitatsklinikum of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, India; Mary Potter Oncology Centre, Pretoria, South Africa; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; and AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE

Corresponding author: Bruce E. Johnson, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: bruce_johnson{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Purpose Vandetanib is a once-daily, oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. The antitumor activity of vandetanib monotherapy or vandetanib with paclitaxel and carboplatin (VPC) was compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) in previously untreated patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and Methods All NSCLC histologies and previously treated CNS metastases were permitted in this partially blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1:1 to receive vandetanib, VPC, or PC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point, and the study was powered to detect a reduced risk of progression with VPC versus PC (hazard ratio = 0.70; one-sided P < .2) and to demonstrate noninferiority for vandetanib versus PC. Overall survival was a secondary assessment.

Results The risk of progression was reduced for patients receiving VPC (n = 56) versus PC (n = 52; hazard ratio = 0.76, one-sided P = .098); median PFS was 24 weeks (VPC) and 23 weeks (PC). The vandetanib monotherapy arm (n = 73) was discontinued after a planned interim PFS analysis met the criterion for discontinuation (hazard ratio > 1.33 v PC). Overall survival was not significantly different between patients receiving VPC or PC. Rash, diarrhea, and hypertension were common adverse events; no pulmonary or CNS hemorrhage events required intervention.

Conclusion VPC could be safely administered to patients with NSCLC, including those with squamous cell histology and treated brain metastases. Compared with the PC control arm, patients receiving VPC had longer PFS, meeting the prespecified study end point, whereas those receiving vandetanib monotherapy had shorter PFS.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on October 20, 2008.

Supported by AstraZeneca (including editorial assistance provided by John Matthew of Mudskipper Bioscience). J.V.H. is a Damon Runyan-Lilly Clinical Investigator supported in part by the Damon Runyan Cancer Research Foundation (Grant No. CI 24-04) and the American Society for Clinical Oncology Career Development Award.

Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 13-17, 2005, Orlando, FL (poster); 11th World Conference on Lung Cancer, July 3-6, 2005, Barcelona, Spain (poster); 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL (poster); and 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, September 2-6, 2007, Seoul, Korea (oral).

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. P. Jane, D. R. Premkumar, S. O. Addo-Yobo, and I. F. Pollack
Abrogation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Akt Signaling by Vandetanib Synergistically Potentiates Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor-Induced Apoptosis in Human Glioma Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2009; 331(1): 327 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
J. S.W. Lind and E. F. Smit
Review: Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, September 1, 2009; 1(2): 95 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. O. Hanrahan, A. J. Ryan, H. Mann, S. J. Kennedy, P. Langmuir, R. B. Natale, R. S. Herbst, B. E. Johnson, and J. V. Heymach
Baseline Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentration as a Potential Predictive Marker of Benefit from Vandetanib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3600 - 3609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. N. Naumov, M. B. Nilsson, T. Cascone, A. Briggs, O. Straume, L. A. Akslen, E. Lifshits, L. A. Byers, L. Xu, H.-k. Wu, et al.
Combined Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Blockade Inhibits Tumor Growth in Xenograft Models of EGFR Inhibitor Resistance
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3484 - 3494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Morabito, M. C. Piccirillo, F. Falasconi, G. De Feo, A. Del Giudice, J. Bryce, M. Di Maio, E. De Maio, N. Normanno, and F. Perrone
Vandetanib (ZD6474), a Dual Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinases: Current Status and Future Directions
Oncologist, April 1, 2009; 14(4): 378 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online