Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7510 on November 3 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 34 (December 1), 2008: pp. 5610-5617
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nabors, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reardon, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nabors, L. B.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Randomized Phase II Study of Cilengitide, an Integrin-Targeting Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid Peptide, in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

David A. Reardon, Karen L. Fink, Tom Mikkelsen, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Alison O'Neill, Scott Plotkin, Michael Glantz, Paula Ravin, Jeffrey J. Raizer, Keith M. Rich, David Schiff, William R. Shapiro, Susan Burdette-Radoux, Edward J. Dropcho, Sabine M. Wittemer, Johannes Nippgen, Martin Picard, L. Burt Nabors

From the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; TransMolecular, Inc, Cambridge; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA; Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Washington University, St Louis, MO; University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, VA; Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; and Merck KGaA Pharmaceuticals, Darmstadt, Germany.

Corresponding author: David A. Reardon, MD, The Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3624, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: reard003{at}mc.duke.edu

Purpose Cilengitide, an inhibitor of {alpha}vβ3 and {alpha}vβ5 integrin receptors, demonstrated minimal toxicity and durable activity across a wide range of doses administered to adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a prior phase I study. The current multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of cilengitide in GBM patients at first recurrence.

Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either 500 or 2,000 mg of cilengitide twice weekly on a continuous basis. Patients were assessed every 4 weeks. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), and radiographic response, as well as quality-of-life and pharmacokinetic assessments.

Results Eighty-one patients were enrolled, including 41 on the 500-mg arm and 40 on the 2,000-mg arm. The safety profile of cilengitide was excellent, with no significant reproducible toxicities observed on either arm. Antitumor activity was observed in both treatment cohorts but trended more favorably among patients treated with 2,000 mg, including a 6-month PFS of 15% and a median OS of 9.9 months.

Conclusion Cilengitide monotherapy is well tolerated and exhibits modest antitumor activity among recurrent GBM patients. Additional studies integrating cilengitide into combinatorial regimens for GBM are warranted.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on November 3, 2008.

Supported by a grant from Merck KGaA and its affiliate EMD Pharmaceuticals.

Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Cilengitide: Does It Really Represent a New Targeted Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma?
    Marc C. Chamberlain
    JCO 2009 27: 1921 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. C. Chamberlain
Cilengitide: Does It Really Represent a New Targeted Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1921 - 1921.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. A. Reardon
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2009; 27(11): 1922 - 1922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
P. Y. Wen, A. D. Norden, and J. Drappatz
Antiangiogenic Therapies for Malignant Gliomas
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 113 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online