|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3956 on November 10 2008 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care
From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine; and Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA Corresponding author: Jennifer Haas, MD, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02120-1613; e-mail: jhaas{at}partners.org Purpose To compare prospectively and retrospectively defined benchmarks for the quality of end-of-life care, including a novel indicator for the use of opiate analgesia. Methods Linked claims and cancer registry data from 1994 to 2003 for New Jersey and Pennsylvania were used to examine prospective and retrospective benchmarks for seniors with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer who participated in state pharmaceutical benefit programs. Results Use of opiates, particularly long-acting opiates, was low in both the prospective and retrospective cohorts (9.1% and 10.1%, respectively), which supported the underuse of palliative care at the end-of-life. Although hospice was used more commonly in the retrospective versus prospective cohort, admission to hospice within 3 days of death was similar in both cohorts (28.8% v 26.4%), as was the rate of death in an acute care hospital. Retrospective and prospective measures identified similar physician and hospital patterns of end-of-life care. In multivariate models, a visit with an oncologist was positively associated with the use of chemotherapy, opiates, and hospice. Patients who were cared for by oncologists in small group practices were more likely to receive chemotherapy (retrospective only) and less likely to receive hospice (both) than those in large groups. Compared with patients who were cared for in teaching hospitals, those in other hospitals were more likely to receive chemotherapy (both) and to have toxicity (prospective) but were less likely to receive opiates (both) and hospice (retrospective). Conclusion Retrospective and prospective measures, including a new measure of the use of opiate analgesia, identify some similar physician and hospital patterns of end-of-life care. published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on November 10, 2008 Supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Contract No. 290-20-050016, with an interagency agreement from the National Cancer Institute, and by the US Department of Health and Human Services as part of the Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions About Effectiveness program. Disclaimer: The authors of this manuscript are responsible for its content. Statements in the manuscript should not be construed as endorsements by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Cancer Institute, or the US Department of Health and Human Services. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|