Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7147 on November 10 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 35 (December 10), 2008: pp. 5721-5727
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanoff, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanoff, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Five-Year Data and Prognostic Factor Analysis of Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan Combinations for Advanced Colorectal Cancer: N9741

Hanna K. Sanoff, Daniel J. Sargent, Megan E. Campbell, Roscoe F. Morton, Charles S. Fuchs, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Stephen K. Williamson, Brian P. Findlay, Henry C. Pitot, Richard M. Goldberg

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology; and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Community Clinical Oncology Program, IA Oncology Research Association, Des Moines, IA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding author: Richard Goldberg, MD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Hematology-Oncology, 3009 Old Clinic Building, CB 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7305; e-mail: goldberg{at}med.unc.edu

Purpose In this report, we update survival (OS) and time-to-progression (TTP) data for the Intergroup trial N9741 after a median 5 years of follow-up by using risk-stratified and prognostic factor analyses to determine if treatment outcomes differ in specific patient subgroups.

Patients and Methods A total of 1,691 patients were randomly assigned to one of seven fluorouracil-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing regimens. OS and TTP were calculated by treatment arm and baseline risk group (on the basis of WBC, performance status, number of sites of disease, and alkaline phosphatase). Multivariate prognostic factor analysis was used to assess clinical factors for their relationships to OS, TTP, response, and toxicity by using Cox and logistic regression models.

Results The observed 5-year survival with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) of 9.8% was better than with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL; 3.7%; P = .04) or with bolus irinotecan/oxaliplatin (IROX; 5.1%; P = .128). OS and TTP were significantly longer for FOLFOX (20.2 months and 8.9 months, respectively) than for IFL (14.6 months and 6.1 months, respectively; P < .001 for both) or for IROX (17.3 months and 6.7 months, respectively; P < .001 for both). OS differed by risk group: 20.7 months for low risk, 17.4 months for intermediate risk, and 9.4 months for high risk (P < .001). FOLFOX treatment was superior in all risk groups and was the most powerful prognostic factor for OS, TTP, response rate, and toxicity.

Conclusion The 9.8% 5-year OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with first-line FOLFOX sets a new benchmark. Neither baseline risk group nor any prognostic factor examined was predictive of treatment-specific outcome. However, treatment efficacy and patient longevity varied as a function of risk group.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on November 10, 2008.

Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants No. CA25224, CA32102, CA38926, CA21115, and CA77202; and by Pfizer Oncology and Sanofi-Aventis.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. G. Fakih, L. Pendyala, G. Fetterly, K. Toth, J. A. Zwiebel, I. Espinoza-Delgado, A. Litwin, Y. M. Rustum, M. E. Ross, J. L. Holleran, et al.
A Phase I, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study on Vorinostat in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Refractory Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 15(9): 3189 - 3195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. H. O'Neil and R. M. Goldberg
In Reply
Oncologist, February 1, 2009; 14(2): 194 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online