Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5950 on September 22 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 35 (December 10), 2008: pp. 5783-5788
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hampel, H.
Right arrow Articles by de la Chapelle, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hampel, H.
Right arrow Articles by de la Chapelle, A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Heather Hampel, Wendy L. Frankel, Edward Martin, Mark Arnold, Karamjit Khanduja, Philip Kuebler, Mark Clendenning, Kaisa Sotamaa, Thomas Prior, Judith A. Westman, Jenny Panescu, Dan Fix, Janet Lockman, Jennifer LaJeunesse, Ilene Comeras, Albert de la Chapelle

From the Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Departments of Molecular Virology, Immunology, Medical Genetics, Pathology, Surgery, and Internal Medicine, Ohio State University; Mount Carmel Health System; and the Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH

Corresponding author: Albert de la Chapelle, MD, PhD, Human Cancer Genetics Program, 646 Medical Research Facility, 804 Biomedical Research Tower, 460 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail: albert.delachapelle{at}osumc.edu

Purpose Identifying individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) is highly beneficial. However, it is unclear whether microsatellite instability (MSI) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) should be used as the screening test and whether screening should target all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or those in high-risk subgroups.

Patients and Methods MSI testing and IHC for the four mismatch repair proteins was performed on 500 tumors from unselected patients with CRC. If either MSI or IHC was abnormal, complete mutation analysis for the mismatch repair genes was performed.

Results Among the 500 patients, 18 patients (3.6%) had LS. All 18 patients detected with LS (100%) had MSI-high tumors; 17 (94%) of 18 patients with LS were correctly predicted by IHC. Of the 18 probands, only eight patients (44%) were diagnosed at age younger than 50 years, and only 13 patients (72%) met the revised Bethesda guidelines. When these results were added to data on 1,066 previously studied patients, the entire study cohort (N = 1,566) showed an overall prevalence of 44 of 1,566 patients (2.8%; 95% CI, 2.1% to 3.8%) for LS. For each proband, on average, three additional family members carried MMR mutations.

Conclusion One of every 35 patients with CRC has LS, and each has at least three relatives with LS; all of whom can benefit from increased cancer surveillance. For screening, IHC is almost equally sensitive as MSI, but IHC is more readily available and helps to direct gene testing. Limiting tumor analysis to patients who fulfill Bethesda criteria would fail to identify 28% (or one in four) cases of LS.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on September 22, 2008.

Supported by Grants No. CA67941 and CA16058 from the National Institutes of Health. This publication was also prepared under a grant from the State of Ohio Biomedical Research and Technology Transfer Commission.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Comprehensive Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Who Can Be the Driving Force in Daily Clinical Practice?
    Stephan Jahn, Michael B. Minai-Pour, Michael R. Speicher, Angelika Reiner-Concin, and Gerald Hoefler
    JCO 2009 27: 2292 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Jahn, M. B. Minai-Pour, M. R. Speicher, A. Reiner-Concin, and G. Hoefler
Comprehensive Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Who Can Be the Driving Force in Daily Clinical Practice?
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2009; 27(13): 2292 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
H. T. Lynch, Z. Gatalica, and J. Knezetic
Molecular Genetics and Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Resolution of the Diagnostic Dilemma of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer, Lynch Syndrome, Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X, and Multiple Polyposis Syndromes
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online