Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1157 on November 17 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 36 (December 20), 2008: pp. 5930-5935
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oechsle, K.
Right arrow Articles by de Wit, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oechsle, K.
Right arrow Articles by de Wit, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors After Chemotherapy: The German Multicenter Positron Emission Tomography Study Group

Karin Oechsle, Michael Hartmann, Winfried Brenner, Stephan Venz, Lothar Weissbach, Christiane Franzius, Sabine Kliesch, Stephan Mueller, Susanne Krege, Ruediger Heicappell, Roland Bares, Carsten Bokemeyer, Maike de Wit

From the Department of Oncology/Hematology/Pneumology, University Medical Center Eppendorf; Departments of Urology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich; Euromed, Urology, Fuerth; Department of Nuclear Medicine; Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster; Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, Essen; Department of Urology, Krankenhaus Maria-Hilf GmbH Krefeld, Krefeld; Department of Urology, ASKLEPIOS Klinikum Uckermark GmbH, Schwedt; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen; and Internal medicine-Haematology and Oncology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany

Corresponding author: Karin Oechsle, MD, Department of Oncology/Hematology, Bone marrow transplantation/Pneumology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; E-Mail: k.oechsle{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Purpose In patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer (NSGCT), residual masses after chemotherapy (CTX) can consist of vital carcinoma, mature teratoma, or necrosis. This prospective trial has evaluated the accuracy of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the prediction of histology compared with computed tomography (CT) and serum tumor markers (STM).

Patients and Methods A total of 121 patients with stage IIC or III NSGCT scheduled for secondary resection after cisplatin-based CTX were included. FDG-PET was performed after completion of CTX. All results were confirmed by histopathology and correlated to STM and CT.

Results Prediction of tumor viability with FDG-PET was correct in 56%, which did not reach the expected clinically relevant level of 70%, and was not better than the accuracy of CT (55%) or STM (56%). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 70% and 48%. The positive predictive values were not significantly different (55%, 61%, and 59% for CT, STM, and PET, respectively). Judging only vital carcinoma as a true malignant finding, the negative predictive value increased to 83% for FDG-PET.

Conclusion The presence of vital carcinoma and mature teratoma is common (55%) in residual masses in patients with NSGCT, and CT and STM cannot reliably predict absence of disease. In contrast to prior studies, this prospective trial, which is the only with histologic confirmation in all patients, demonstrated that FDG-PET is unable to give a clear additional clinical benefit to the standard diagnostic procedures, CT and STM, in the prediction of tumor viability in residual masses.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on November 17, 2008.

The study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Presented in part at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 13-17, 2005, Orlando, FL.

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in UrologyHome page
H. J. Lavery, R. R. Bahnson, D. S. Sharp, and K. S. Pohar
Management of the residual post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal mass in germ cell tumors
Therapeutic Advances in Urology, October 1, 2009; 1(4): 199 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online