Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2221 on November 24 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 36 (December 20), 2008: pp. 5988-5993
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daugherty, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hlubocky, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daugherty, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hlubocky, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Are Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Told About Their Expected Deaths? A Study of Cancer Physicians’ Self-Reports of Prognosis Disclosure

Christopher K. Daugherty, Fay J. Hlubocky

From the Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, and the Cancer Research Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Corresponding author: Christopher K. Daugherty, MD, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637; e-mail: cdaugher{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Purpose Little is known about how physicians discuss prognosis with terminally ill cancer patients. Thus, we sought to obtain cancer physicians’ self-reports of their prognosis communication practices.

Methods A survey seeking self-reports regarding prognosis communication with their terminally ill cancer patients was mailed to a systematic sample of medical oncologists in the United States.

Results Of 1,137 physicians, 729 completed and returned surveys (64% response rate). Median age of respondents was 51 years (range, 33 to 80 years); 82% were men. Respondents had practiced cancer care for a median of 18 years (range, 1.5 to 50 years) and reported seeing a median of 60 patients per week (range, 0 to 250 patients per week). Although 98% said their usual practice is to tell terminally ill patients that they will die, 48% specifically described communicating terminal prognoses to patients only when specific preferences for prognosis information were expressed. Forty-three percent said they always or usually communicate a medical estimate of time as to when death is likely to occur, and 57% reported sometimes, rarely, or never giving a time frame. Seventy-three percent said prognosis communication education was either absent or inadequate during their training, and 96% believed it should be part of cancer care training.

Conclusion Medical oncologists report routinely informing their terminally ill patients that they will die. However, they are divided in describing themselves as either always discussing a terminal prognosis or doing so if it is consistent with their patients’ preferences for prognostic information. Most medical oncologists say they do not routinely communicate an estimated survival time to their patients.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on November 24, 2008

Supported by grants from the Faculty Scholar Program of the Soros Foundation's Institute for an Open Society, the Project on Death in America (C.K.D.), and Grant No. RO1 CA 087605-01A1 from the National Institutes of Health (C.K.D.).

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
E. Finlay and D. Casarett
Making Difficult Discussions Easier: Using Prognosis to Facilitate Transitions to Hospice
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2009; 59(4): 250 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online