Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 4 (February 1), 2008: pp. 527-534
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7837

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korn, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkwood, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korn, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkwood, J. M.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Meta-Analysis of Phase II Cooperative Group Trials in Metastatic Stage IV Melanoma to Determine Progression-Free and Overall Survival Benchmarks for Future Phase II Trials

Edward L. Korn, Ping-Yu Liu, Sandra J. Lee, Judith-Anne W. Chapman, Donna Niedzwiecki, Vera J. Suman, James Moon, Vernon K. Sondak, Michael B. Atkins, Elizabeth A. Eisenhauer, Wendy Parulekar, Svetomir N. Markovic, Scott Saxman, John M. Kirkwood

From the Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Office, Seattle, WA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute of Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; Peace Corps, Washington, DC; and Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Corresponding author: Edward L. Korn, PhD, Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8129, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892; e-mail: korne{at}ctep.nci.nih.gov

Purpose Objective tumor response rates observed in phase II trials for metastatic melanoma have historically not provided a reliable indicator of meaningful survival benefits. To facilitate using overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) as an endpoint for future phase II trials, we evaluated historical data from cooperative group phase II trials to attempt to develop benchmarks for OS and PFS as reference points for future phase II trials.

Patients and Methods Individual-level and trial-level data were obtained for patients enrolled onto 42 phase II trials (70 trial arms) that completed accrual in the years 1975 through 2005 and conducted by Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables, and between-trial(-arm) variability in 1-year OS rates and 6-month PFS rates were examined.

Results Statistically significant individual-level and trial-level prognostic factors found in a multivariate survival analysis for OS were performance status, presence of visceral disease, sex, and whether the trial excluded patients with brain metastases. Performance status, sex, and age were statistically significant prognostic factors for PFS. Controlling for these prognostic variables essentially eliminated between-trial variability in 1-year OS rates but not in 6-month PFS rates.

Conclusion Benchmarks are provided for 1-year OS or OS curves that make use of the distribution of prognostic factors of the patients in the phase II trial. A similar benchmark for 6-month PFS is provided, but its use is more problematic because of residual between-trial variation in this endpoint.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Using Benchmarks Based on Historical Survival Rates for Screening New Therapies for Stage IV Melanoma Patients
    Phyllis A. Gimotty, DuPont Guerry, and Keith Flaherty
    JCO 2008 26: 517-518 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
P. A. Philip, M. Mooney, D. Jaffe, G. Eckhardt, M. Moore, N. Meropol, L. Emens, E. O'Reilly, M. Korc, L. Ellis, et al.
Consensus Report of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting on Pancreas Cancer Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2009; 27(33): 5660 - 5669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. R. Minor, D. Moore, C. Kim, M. Kashani-Sabet, S. S. Venna, W. Wang, P. Boasberg, and S. O'Day
Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Biochemotherapy and Maintenance Immunotherapy
Oncologist, October 1, 2009; 14(10): 995 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
C. L.H. Snozek, D. J. O'Kane, and A. Algeciras-Schimnich
Pharmacogenetics of Solid Tumors: Directed Therapy in Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer: A Paper from the 2008 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2009; 11(5): 381 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Weber, J. A. Thompson, O. Hamid, D. Minor, A. Amin, I. Ron, R. Ridolfi, H. Assi, A. Maraveyas, D. Berman, et al.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Ipilimumab Administered with or without Prophylactic Budesonide in Patients with Unresectable Stage III or IV Melanoma
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 15(17): 5591 - 5598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. Robert and F. Ghiringhelli
What Is the Role of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 Blockade in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma?
Oncologist, August 1, 2009; 14(8): 848 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. LeBlanc, C. Rankin, and J. Crowley
Multiple Histology Phase II Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 15(13): 4256 - 4262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Rubinstein, J. Crowley, P. Ivy, M. LeBlanc, and D. Sargent
Randomized Phase II Designs
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 15(6): 1883 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. H. Camacho, S. Antonia, J. Sosman, J. M. Kirkwood, T. F. Gajewski, B. Redman, D. Pavlov, C. Bulanhagui, V. A. Bozon, J. Gomez-Navarro, et al.
Phase I/II Trial of Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2009; 27(7): 1075 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Sharma, A. K. Sharma, S. V. Madhunapantula, D. Desai, S. J. Huh, P. Mosca, S. Amin, and G. P. Robertson
Targeting Akt3 Signaling in Malignant Melanoma Using Isoselenocyanates
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 15(5): 1674 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. B. Atkins, J. Hsu, S. Lee, G. I. Cohen, L. E. Flaherty, J. A. Sosman, V. K. Sondak, and J. M. Kirkwood
Phase III Trial Comparing Concurrent Biochemotherapy With Cisplatin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine, Interleukin-2, and Interferon Alfa-2b With Cisplatin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine Alone in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma (E3695): A Trial Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2008; 26(35): 5748 - 5754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. R. Kirshner, S. He, V. Balasubramanyam, J. Kepros, C.-Y. Yang, M. Zhang, Z. Du, J. Barsoum, and J. Bertin
Elesclomol induces cancer cell apoptosis through oxidative stress
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2008; 7(8): 2319 - 2327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. J. Moschos, P. M. Chaudhary, and J. M. Kirkwood
Resolving "Kinks" of Chemotherapy in Melanoma
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 833 - 835.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. A. Gimotty, D. Guerry, and K. Flaherty
Using Benchmarks Based on Historical Survival Rates for Screening New Therapies for Stage IV Melanoma Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 26(4): 517 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online