Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 5 (February 10), 2008: pp. 721-728
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1068
Development of the 21-Gene Assay and Its Application in Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials
Joseph A. Sparano,
Soonmyung Paik
From the Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; and the Division of Pathology, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA
Corresponding author: Joseph A. Sparano, MD, Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Division, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461; e-mail: jsparano{at}montefiore.org
Several multigene markers that predict relapse more accurately than classical clinicopathologic features have been developed. The 21-gene assay was developed specifically for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, and has been shown to predict distant recurrence more accurately that classical clinicopathologic features in patients with ER-positive breast cancer and negative axillary nodes treated with adjuvant tamoxifen; validation studies in this population led to its approval as a diagnostic test. In a similar population, it also may be used to assess the benefit of adding chemotherapy to hormonal therapy. Other validation studies indicate that it also predicts the risk of distant and local recurrence in other populations with ER-positive disease, including node-negative patients receiving no adjuvant therapy and patients with positive axillary nodes treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. The Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) is multicenter trial that integrates the 21-gene assay into the clinical decision-making process and is designed to refine the utility of the assay in clinical practice and to provide a resource for evaluating additional molecular markers as they are developed in the future.
Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hugh, J. Hanson, M. C. U. Cheang, T. O. Nielsen, C. M. Perou, C. Dumontet, J. Reed, M. Krajewska, I. Treilleux, M. Rupin, et al.
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Docetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2009;
27(8):
1168 - 1176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Sotiriou and L. Pusztai
Gene-Expression Signatures in Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
February 19, 2009;
360(8):
790 - 800.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schmidt, A. Victor, D. Bratzel, D. Boehm, C. Cotarelo, A. Lebrecht, W. Siggelkow, J. G. Hengstler, A. Elsasser, M. Gehrmann, et al.
Long-term outcome prediction by clinicopathological risk classification algorithms in node-negative breast cancer--comparison between Adjuvant!, St Gallen, and a novel risk algorithm used in the prospective randomized Node-Negative-Breast Cancer-3 (NNBC-3) trial
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2009;
20(2):
258 - 264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dowsett and A. K. Dunbier
Emerging Biomarkers and New Understanding of Traditional Markers in Personalized Therapy for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2008;
14(24):
8019 - 8026.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem.,
December 1, 2008;
54(12):
e11 - e79.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|