Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 6 (February 20), 2008: pp. 963-970
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7431

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asnacios, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buscail, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asnacios, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buscail, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Indium-111–Pentetreotide Scintigraphy and Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Expression: New Prognostic Factors for Malignant Well-Differentiated Endocrine Tumors

Amani Asnacios, Frédéric Courbon, Philippe Rochaix, Eric Bauvin, Valérie Cances-Lauwers, Christiane Susini, Stefan Schulz, Andrée Boneu, Rosine Guimbaud, Louis Buscail

From the Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, and Nuclear Medicine, Claudius Regaud Institute; Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Toulouse-Purpan; Department of Gastroenterology and School of Medicine, Toulouse-Rangueil; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, Toulouse, France; and Department of Pharmacology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany

Corresponding author: Louis Buscail, MD, L’Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale 858, I2MR, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil, BP 84225-31432 Toulouse Cedex 04, France; e-mail: Louis.Buscail{at}toulouse.inserm.fr

Purpose Well-differentiated metastatic endocrine carcinomas are difficult to manage because of variable disease outcome. New prognostic factors are required. These tumors overexpress somatostatin receptors (sst), implying the use of somatostatin analogs for tumor localization by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using indium-111–pentetreotide (111In-pentetreotide) and for medical treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, sst receptor expression, and prognosis.

Patients and Methods Between 1994 and 2002, 48 consecutive patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a negative 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy were retrospectively paired according to sex, age, and tumor localization with 50 patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a positive tracer uptake at 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. Overall survival and expression of sst1 to sst5 receptors by immunohistochemistry were assessed.

Results The lack of tracer uptake at the 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy seemed to be a poor prognostic factor (P = .007) for overall survival by Kaplan-Meier test and in multivariate analysis; age and absence of clinical secretory syndrome also seemed to be poor prognostic factors. The tracer uptake (positive 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy) correlated with the tumor expression of somatostatin receptor sst2 (P < .001) but not with that of sst1, sst3, sst4, or sst5. In a bivariate analysis, lack of sst2 expression also significantly correlated with poor prognosis.

Conclusion We demonstrate the prognostic value of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in well-differentiated malignant endocrine tumors. In these tumors, sst2 somatostatin receptor expression correlates with both tracer uptake and a better prognosis.

Supported by grants from Groupe de Recherche de l’Institut Claudius Régaud, Association pour la Recherche Contre le Cancer, and L’Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Lesche, D. Lehmann, F. Nagel, H. A. Schmid, and S. Schulz
Differential Effects of Octreotide and Pasireotide on Somatostatin Receptor Internalization and Trafficking in Vitro
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2009; 94(2): 654 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Fischer, C. Doll, S. Jacobs, A. Kolodziej, R. Stumm, and S. Schulz
Reassessment of sst2 Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Human Normal and Neoplastic Tissues Using the Novel Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody UMB-1
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4519 - 4524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online