Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9437 on January 28 2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dowsett, M. Articles by Buzdar, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dowsett, M. Articles by Buzdar, A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Relationship Between Quantitative Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Expression and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) Status With Recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trial

Mitch Dowsett, Craig Allred, Jill Knox, Emma Quinn, Janine Salter, Chris Wale, Jack Cuzick, Joan Houghton, Norman Williams, Elizabeth Mallon, Hugh Bishop, Ian Ellis, Denis Larsimont, Hironobu Sasano, Pauline Carder, Antonio Llombart Cussac, Fiona Knox, Valerie Speirs, John Forbes, Aman Buzdar

From the Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital; Departments of Epidemiology and Mathematics & Statistics, Cancer Research UK, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine; Clinical Trials Group, Department of Surgery, University College London, London; Department of Pathology, The Western Infirmary, Glasgow; Department of Surgery, The Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton; Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham; Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford; Wythenshawe Hospital, Wythenshawe, Manchester; Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Department of Pathology, Translational Research Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Arnau Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Mater Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Corresponding author: Mitch Dowsett, MD, Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom; e-mail: mitch.dowsett{at}icr.ac.uk

Purpose To determine the relationship between quantitative estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) expression and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) status with time to recurrence (TTR) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive primary breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy.

Patients and Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were retrospectively collected from patients in the monotherapy arms of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and centrally tested for ER, PgR and HER-2. ER and PgR were scored using continuous scales and HER-2 was scored as 0 to 3+ with 2+ cases being analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Results Blocks were collected from 2,006 of 5,880 eligible patients. Tissue was assessable and ER and/or PgR positivity confirmed centrally in 1,782 cases. In these, TTR was longer for anastrozole than for tamoxifen by a similar extent to that in the overall trial. None of the three biomarkers identified a set of patients with differential benefit from anastrozole over tamoxifen. Patients with low ER, low PgR, and high HER-2 expression had a poorer prognosis with either drug. Only 2.6% of patients in the highest quartile of PgR experienced recurrence after 5 years, compared with 13.2% in the lowest quartile.

Conclusion Quantitative expression of ER and PgR and HER-2 status did not identify patients with differential relative benefit from anastrozole over tamoxifen: TTR was longer for anastrozole than for tamoxifen in all molecular subgroups. Low ER or PgR or high HER-2 expression are associated with a high risk of recurrence with either anastrozole or tamoxifen.

Supported by Breakthrough Breast Cancer, AstraZeneca, and the Royal Marsden Hospital.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on January 28, 2008.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Kaufman, J. R. Mackey, M. R. Clemens, P. P. Bapsy, A. Vaid, A. Wardley, S. Tjulandin, M. Jahn, M. Lehle, A. Feyereislova, et al. Trastuzumab Plus Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole Alone for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III TAnDEM Study J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2009; 27(33): 5529 - 5537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Howell, A. M. Wardley, and A. C. Armstrong Re: Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, November 5, 2009; (2009) djp390v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, E. Botteri, M. Lazzeroni, N. Rotmensz, A. Goldhirsch, C. Varricchio, D. Serrano, M. Cazzaniga, F. Bassi, A. Luini, et al. Low-dose tamoxifen in the treatment of breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a large observational study Ann. Onc., October 25, 2009; (2009) mdp408v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Iverson, C. Gillett, P. Cane, C. D. Santini, T. M. Vess, L. Kam-Morgan, A. Wang, M. Eisenberg, C. M. Rowland, J. J. Hessling, et al. A Single-Tube Quantitative Assay for mRNA Levels of Hormonal and Growth Factor Receptors in Breast Cancer Specimens J. Mol. Diagn., March 1, 2009; 11(2): 117 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Badve and H Nakshatri Oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: towards bridging histopathological and molecular classifications J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2009; 62(1): 6 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Burstein and R. S. Punglia Optimizing Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women: Incorporating Decision Modeling Analysis ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 35 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dowsett and A. K. Dunbier Emerging Biomarkers and New Understanding of Traditional Markers in Personalized Therapy for Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 14(24): 8019 - 8026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C Turner and A. L Jones Management of breast cancer--Part II BMJ, July 11, 2008; 337(jul11_2): a540 - a540. [Full Text]

				P. S. Steeg Heterogeneity of Drug Target Expression Among Metastatic Lesions: Lessons from a Breast Cancer Autopsy Program Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3643 - 3645. [Full Text] [PDF]