|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 26, No 8 (March 10), 2008: pp. 1260-1268 © 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4338 Use of Different Postmenopausal Hormone Therapies and Risk of Histology- and Hormone Receptor–Defined Invasive Breast Cancer
From the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Villejuif, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; EA4045, Universite Paris-Sud, Paris, France; and Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Milan, Italy Corresponding author: Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, PhD, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ERI 20, EA 4045, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France; e-mail: clavel{at}igr.fr Purpose We previously found that the risk of invasive breast cancer varied according to the progestagen component of combined postmenopausal hormone therapy (CHT): progesterone, dydrogesterone, or other progestagens. We conducted the present study to assess how these CHTs were associated with histology- and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer. Patients and Methods We used data from the French E3N cohort study, with 80,391 postmenopausal women followed for a mean duration of 8.1 years; 2,265 histologically confirmed invasive breast cancers were identified through biennial self-administered questionnaires completed from 1990 to 2002. The relative risks (RRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) never-use, ever-use of estrogen+progesterone was not significantly associated with the risk of any breast cancer subtype, but increasing duration of estrogen+progesterone was associated with increasing risks of lobular (P = .06) and estrogen receptor–positive/progesterone receptor–negative (ER+/PR–; P = .02). Estrogen+dydrogesterone was associated with a significant increase in risk of lobular carcinoma (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6). Estrogen+other progestagens was associated with significant increases in risk of ductal and lobular carcinomas (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8; and 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7, respectively), of ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR– carcinomas (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1; and 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.5, respectively), but not of ER–/PR+ or ER–/PR– carcinomas (RR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.1; and 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.0, respectively). Conclusion The increase in risk of breast cancer observed with the use of CHTs other than estrogen+progesterone and estrogen+dydrogesterone seems to apply preferentially to ER+ carcinomas, especially those ER+/PR–, and to affect both ductal and lobular carcinomas. Supported by Mutuelle Générale de lEducation Nationale; European Community; French League against Cancer; Gustave Roussy Institute; French Institute of Health and Medical Research; 3M Company; several General Councils of France; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Cancéropôle Région Ile-de-France; Direction Générale de la Santé; Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|