Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5339 on February 23 2009
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 10 (April 1), 2009: pp. 1712-1721
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Stopping or Reporting Early for Positive Results in Randomized Clinical Trials: The National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Experience From 1990 to 2005
Edward L. Korn,
Boris Freidlin,
Margaret Mooney
From the Biometric Research Branch and the Clinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Corresponding author: Edward L. Korn, PhD, Biometric Research Branch, EPN-8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892; e-mail: korne{at}ctep.nci.nih.gov.
Randomized clinical trials are designed with stopping boundaries to guide data monitoring committees with their decision making concerning ongoing trials. In particular, when extremely positive results are seen and a boundary is crossed, the data monitoring committee may recommend releasing the results earlier to the public than at the definitive final analysis time specified in the protocol. For trials that are still accruing, this also means stopping accrual. Because the information about treatment efficacy is more limited in an early analysis than in a final analysis, questions have been raised about the appropriateness of incorporating early stopping for positive results in trial designs. In particular, there are concerns that treatment effects seen early may not be real or may be overly optimistic. To examine this issue, we collected information about treatment efficacy on National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group trials that were stopped early for positive results (information both at the time the trial was stopped/released and at times of further follow-up). Twenty-seven such trials were located. For 17 of 18 of these trials with sufficient follow-up information, the treatment effect was similar or only slightly smaller at last follow-up compared with the stopping/release time. We critically evaluate reasons why one might be concerned about early stopping for positive results. We conclude that for trials with well-designed interim monitoring plans, the ability to stop early for positive results is an important component of the trial design, allowing the public to benefit as soon as possible from the study conclusions.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related Editorial
- Early Stopping for Benefit in National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Randomized Phase III Trials: The System Is Working
Daniel Sargent
JCO 2009 27: 1543-1544
[Full Text]
Related Correspondence
- Stopping Trials Early for Positive Results: The Need to Know How Much
Carl D. Atkins
JCO 2009 27: 29
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Atkins
Stopping Trials Early for Positive Results: The Need to Know How Much
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2009;
27(21):
e29 - e29.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Korn, B. Freidlin, and M. Mooney
Reply to C.D. Atkins
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 20, 2009;
27(21):
e30 - e30.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Sargent
Early Stopping for Benefit in National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Randomized Phase III Trials: The System Is Working
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 1, 2009;
27(10):
1543 - 1544.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|