Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0931 on March 2 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 11 (April 10), 2009: pp. 1800-1805
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Publisher's Note
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ratain, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase I and Clinical Pharmacology

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Hepatic or Renal Dysfunction: CALGB 60301

Antonius A. Miller, Daryl J. Murry, Kouros Owzar, Donna R. Hollis, Erin B. Kennedy, Ghassan Abou-Alfa, Apurva Desai, Jimmy Hwang, Miguel A. Villalona-Calero, E. Claire Dees, Lionel D. Lewis, Marwan G. Fakih, Martin J. Edelman, Fred Millard, Richard C. Frank, Raymond J. Hohl, Mark J. Ratain

From the Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Iowa College of Pharmacy; University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, IA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; University of California, San Diego, CA; and Whittingham Cancer Center, Norwalk, CT.

Corresponding author: Antonius A. Miller, MD, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC; e-mail: aamiller{at}wfubmc.edu.

Purpose We sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine a tolerable dose of oral sorafenib in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction.

Patients and Methods Patients were assigned to one of nine cohorts: cohort 1, bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) and AST ≤ ULN and creatinine clearance (CC) ≥ 60 mL/min; cohort 2, bilirubin more than ULN but ≤ 1.5x ULN and/or AST more than ULN; cohort 3, CC between 40 and 59 mL/min; cohort 4, bilirubin more than 1.5x ULN to ≤ 3x ULN (any AST); cohort 5, CC between 20 and 39 mL/min; cohort 6, bilirubin more than 3x ULN to 10x ULN (any AST); cohort 7, CC less than 20 mL/min; cohort 8, albumin less than 2.5 mg/dL (any bilirubin/AST); and cohort 9, hemodialysis. Sorafenib was administered as a 400-mg dose on day 1 for PK, and continuous daily dosing started on day 8.

Results Of 150 registered patients, 138 patients were treated. With the exception of cohorts 6 and 7, at least 12 patients per cohort were assessable, and the dose level with prospectively defined dose-limiting toxicity in less than one third of patients by day 29 was considered tolerable. No significant associations between the sorafenib PK and cohort were found.

Conclusion We recommend the following empiric sorafenib starting doses by cohort: cohort 1, 400 mg twice a day; cohort 2, 400 mg twice a day; cohort 3, 400 mg twice a day; cohort 4, 200 mg twice a day; cohort 5, 200 mg twice a day; cohort 6, not even 200 mg every third day tolerable; cohort 7, not defined; cohort 8, 200 mg each day; and cohort 9, 200 mg each day.

Written on behalf of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA31946 (to the Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Richard L. Schilsky, MD, Chair), CA33601 (to the CALGB Statistical Center; Stephen George, PhD), CA77651, CA41287, CA77597, CA03927, CA47559, CA04326, CA02599, CA77658, CA31983, CA11789, CA47642, and CA47577.

Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical Trials repository link available on JCO.org.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Kim, F. M. Balis, and B. C. Widemann
Sorafenib and Sunitinib
Oncologist, August 1, 2009; 14(8): 800 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online