|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6048 on March 9 2009 © 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab: Overall and KRAS-Specific Results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 TrialFrom the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; and Departments of Oncology and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto; Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener; and Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia; Hôpital Notre-Dame, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne; and Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney; and Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital, Herston, Australia. Corresponding author: Heather-Jane Au, MD, MPH, Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada; e-mail: heathera{at}cancerboard.ab.ca. Purpose National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 demonstrated the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab improves overall and progression-free survival in patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in patients with wild-type KRAS tumors. This article reports the health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) outcomes from CO.17. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 572) with pretreated EGFR-detectable advanced CRC were randomly assigned to cetuximab and best supportive care (BSC) or to BSC alone. HRQL primary end points assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 were physical function (PF) and global health status (GHS); mean changes from baseline to 8 and 16 weeks were assessed. Post hoc analysis by KRAS mutation status was performed. Results Questionnaire compliance was 94% at baseline, but it declined differentially (67% v 47% for cetuximab v BSC at 16 weeks). PF change scores were –3.9 for cetuximab and –8.6 for BSC (P = .046) at 8 weeks and were –5.9 and –12.5 for cetuximab and BSC, respectively, (P = .027) at 16 weeks. GHS change scores were –0.5 and –7.1 (P = .008) at 8 weeks and were –3.6 and –15.2 (P = .008) at 16 weeks for cetuximab and BSC, respectively. In patients who had tumors with wild-type KRAS status, cetuximab resulted in less PF deterioration at 8 weeks (–0.7 v –7.2; P = .11) and 16 weeks (–3.4 v –13.8; P = .008) compared with BSC. Patients with wild-type status who received cetuximab experienced improved GHS at 8 weeks, whereas patients who received BSC alone deteriorated (3.2 v –7.7; P = .002). Cetuximab preserved GHS at 16 weeks (–0.2 v –18.1; P < .001). No significant differences were noted between study arms for patients with mutated KRAS tumors. Conclusion Cetuximab offers important HRQL and survival benefits for pretreated patients with advanced, wild-type KRAS CRC. Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and ImClone Systems Inc. Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article. Clinical Trials repository link available on JCO.org.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|