Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8953 on March 23 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 13 (May 1), 2009: pp. 2122-2128
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v27,p3263)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tandstad, T.
Right arrow Articles by Klepp, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tandstad, T.
Right arrow Articles by Klepp, O.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genitourinary Cancer

Risk-Adapted Treatment in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer: The SWENOTECA Management Program

Torgrim Tandstad, Olav Dahl, Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark, Eva Cavallin-Stahl, Ulrika Stierner, Arne Solberg, Carl Langberg, Roy M. Bremnes, Anna Laurell, Hans Wijkstrøm, Olbjørn Klepp

From the Department of Oncology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim; Department of Oncology, Haukeland Hospital and Section of Oncology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen; Cancer Center, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Norway and University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm; Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gøteborg; Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; and the Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.

Corresponding author: Torgrim Tandstad, MD, Department of Oncology, St Olavs University Hospital, Olav Kyrres gt 17, 7006 Trondheim, Norway; e-mail: torgrim.tandstad{at}stolav.no.

Purpose To offer minimized risk-adapted adjuvant treatment on a nationwide basis for patients with clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer (NSGCT). The aim was to reduce the risk of relapse and thereby reducing the need of later salvage chemotherapy while maintaining a high cure rate.

Patients and Methods From 1998 to 2005, 745 Norwegian and Swedish patients were included into a prospective, community-based multicenter Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Project (SWENOTECA) management program. Treatment strategy depended on the presence or absence of vascular tumor invasion (VASC). VASC-positive patients were recommended brief adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), whereas VASC-negative patients could choose between ACT and surveillance.

Results At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, there have been 51 relapses. On surveillance, 41.7% of VASC+ patients relapsed, compared with 13.2% of VASC– patients. After one course of BEP, 3.2% of VASC+ and 1.3% of VASC– patients relapsed. The toxicity of adjuvant BEP was low. Eight patients have died, none died from progressive disease.

Conclusion One course of adjuvant BEP reduces the risk of relapse by approximately 90% in both VASC+ and VASC– CS1 NSGCT, and may be a new option as initial treatment for all CS1 NSGCT. One course of adjuvant BEP for VASC+ CS1 reduces the total burden of chemotherapy compared with surveillance or two courses of BEP. SWENOTECA currently recommends one course of BEP as standard treatment of VASC+ CS1 NSGCT, whereas both surveillance and one course of BEP are options for VASC– CS1 NSGCT.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Vox Populi: Using Community-Based Studies to Determine Best Management of Early-Stage Nonseminoma
    Craig R. Nichols and Christian Kollmannsberger
    JCO 2009 27: 2114-2116 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Kollmannsberger, C. Moore, K. N. Chi, N. Murray, S. Daneshmand, M. Gleave, B. Hayes-Lattin, and C.R. Nichols
Non-risk-adapted surveillance for patients with stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumors: diminishing treatment-related morbidity while maintaining efficacy
Ann. Onc., October 29, 2009; (2009) mdp473v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Risk-Adapted Management of Early-Stage Testicular Cancer
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, May 12, 2009; 2009(512): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online