Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9810 on April 20 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 15 (May 20), 2009: pp. 2450-2456
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, E. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genitourinary Cancer

Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916

Maha Hussain, Bryan Goldman, Cathy Tangen, Celestia S. Higano, Daniel P. Petrylak, George Wilding, Atif M. Akdas, Eric J. Small, Bryan J. Donnelly, Subramanian Kanaga Sundram, Patrick A. Burch, Robert S. DiPaola, E. David Crawford

From the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center; and University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Columbia University, New York, NY; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Cancer and Leukemia Group B, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; National Cancer Institute of Canada, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Pontefract General Infirmary, Pontefract West Yorks, United Kingdom; North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; and University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, CO.

Corresponding author: Maha H.A. Hussain, MD, FACP, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 7314 CCGC, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0946; e-mail: mahahuss{at}umich.edu.

Purpose Prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA-P) is an indicator of progression in hormone-sensitive (HS) and castration-resistant (CR) prostate cancer (PC). We evaluated different definitions of PSA-P as predictors of overall survival (OS).

Patients and Methods A total of 1,078 patients with HSPC who were on hormones (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] trial 9346 [S9346]) and 597 patients with CRPC who were treated with chemotherapy (SWOG trial 9916 [S9916]) were eligible for this analysis. PSA-P definitions tested included the following: PSA Working Group, Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG 2008), and other definitions. A time-varying approach analyzed associations between PSA-P at any time and OS. A landmark analysis examined the relationship between PSA-P status at 7 months for S9346, or 3 months for S9916, and subsequent OS.

Results In the time-varying analysis, both working groups definitions were strongly associated with OS (P < .001) in both study settings. In patients enrolled onto S9346, both definitions predicted a 2.4-fold increased risk of death (ROD) and a greater than four-fold increased ROD if PSA-P occurred in the first 7 months. In S9916, they predicted a 40% increase in ROD and a two-fold increase in ROD if PSA-P occurred at 3 months. In landmark analyses of patients on S9346 by using the PCWG 2008 definition of PSA-P, median subsequent OS was 10 months versus 44 months in patients who did or did not have PSA-P by 7 months, respectively; in S9916, data were 11 months versus 18 months for patients who did or did not have PSA-P by 3 months, respectively.

Conclusion PSA-P, defined as an increase of ≥ 25% greater than the nadir and an absolute increase of at least 2 or 5 ng/mL, predicts OS in HSPC and CRPC and may be a suitable end point for phase II studies in these settings.

Presented in part at the 44th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 30-June 3, 2008, Chicago, IL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00002651.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. J. Armstrong and P. G. Febbo
Using Surrogate Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Benefit in Men with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update and Review of the Literature
Oncologist, August 1, 2009; 14(8): 816 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online