Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9114 on May 11 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 19 (July 1), 2009: pp. 3217-3224
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grønberg, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sundstrøm, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grønberg, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sundstrøm, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase III Study by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group: Pemetrexed Plus Carboplatin Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin As First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Bjørn H. Grønberg, Roy M. Bremnes, Øystein Fløtten, Tore Amundsen, Paal Fr. Brunsvig, Harald H. Hjelde, Stein Kaasa, Christian von Plessen, Frøydis Stornes, Terje Tollåli, Finn Wammer, Ulf Aasebø, Stein Sundstrøm

From the Departments of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Departments of Oncology and Pulmonology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim; Departments of Oncology and Pulmonology, University Hospital of North Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital; Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen; Cancer Clinic, Rikshospitalet – Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, University of Oslo; Department of Pulmonology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo; Department of Internal Medicine, Bodø Hospital, Bodø; and Department of Internal Medicine, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.

Corresponding author: Bjørn H. Grønberg, MD, 3. etg, Gastro Sør, St. Olavs Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway; e-mail: bjorn.h.gronberg{at}gmail.com.

Purpose To compare pemetrexed/carboplatin with a standard regimen as first-line therapy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer NSCLC.

Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status of 0 to 2 were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 5 (Calvert's formula) on day 1 or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC = 5 on day 1 every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. The primary end point was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) defined as global quality of life, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and fatigue reported on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and the lung cancer–specific module LC13 during the first 20 weeks. Secondary end points were overall survival and toxicity.

Results Four hundred thirty-six eligible patients were enrolled from April 2005 to July 2006. Patients who completed the baseline questionnaire were analyzed for HRQoL (n = 427), and those who received ≥ one cycle of chemotherapy were analyzed for toxicity (n = 423). Compliance of HRQoL questionnaires was 87%. There were no significant differences for the primary HRQoL end points or in overall survival between the two treatment arms (pemetrexed/carboplatin, 7.3 months; gemcitabine/carboplatin, 7.0 months; P = .63). The patients who received gemcitabine/carboplatin had more grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity than patients who received pemetrexed/carboplatin, including leukopenia (46% v 23%, respectively; P < .001), neutropenia (51% v 40%, respectively; P = .024), and thrombocytopenia (56% v 24%, respectively; P < .001). More patients on the gemcitabine/carboplatin arm received transfusions of RBCs and platelets, whereas the frequencies of neutropenic infections and thrombocytopenic bleedings were similar on both arms.

Conclusion Pemetrexed/carboplatin provides similar HRQoL and survival when compared with gemcitabine/carboplatin with less hematologic toxicity and less need for supportive care.

Supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly.

Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL; and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, September 2-6, 2007, Seoul, Korea.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online