Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5511 on May 18 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 20 (July 10), 2009: pp. 3312-3318
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Escudier, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bukowski, R. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Escudier, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bukowski, R. M.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genitourinary Cancer

Sorafenib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Efficacy and Safety Results of the Phase III Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial

Bernard Escudier, Tim Eisen, Walter M. Stadler, Cezary Szczylik, Stéphane Oudard, Michael Staehler, Sylvie Negrier, Christine Chevreau, Apurva A. Desai, Frédéric Rolland, Tomasz Demkow, Thomas E. Hutson, Martin Gore, Sibyl Anderson, Gloria Hofilena, Minghua Shan, Carol Pena, Chetan Lathia, Ronald M. Bukowski

From the From Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge; Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom; Military School of Medicine; Centrum Onkologii, Warsaw, Poland; Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik Klinikum der Universität Großhadern Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität, München, Germany; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ; and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.

Corresponding author: Bernard Escudier, MD, Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France; e-mail: escudier{at}igr.fr.

Purpose Mature survival data and evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a prognostic biomarker from the Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET) study in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are reported.

Patients and Methods Nine hundred three previously treated patients were randomly assigned to receive sorafenib versus placebo. On demonstration of progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with sorafenib, patients assigned to placebo were offered sorafenib. Overall survival (OS) was determined at two planned interim analyses and one final analysis, with a secondary OS analysis conducted by censoring placebo patients who crossed over to sorafenib. The relationships between baseline VEGF level and prognosis and efficacy were evaluated.

Results The final OS of patients receiving sorafenib was comparable with that of patients receiving placebo (17.8 v 15.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88; P = .146); however, when post–cross-over placebo survival data were censored, the difference became significant (17.8 v 14.3 months, respectively; HR = 0.78; P = .029). Adverse events at 16 months after cross over were similar to those previously reported. Baseline VEGF levels correlated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P < .0001), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center score (P < .0001), and PFS and OS in univariate (PFS, P = .0013; OS, P = .0009) and multivariate (PFS, P = .0231; OS, P = .0416) analyses of placebo patients and with short OS by multivariate analysis of patients receiving sorafenib (P = .0145). Both high-VEGF (P < .01) and low-VEGF (P < .01) groups benefited from sorafenib.

Conclusion Although an OS benefit was not seen on a primary intent-to-treat analysis, results of a secondary OS analysis censoring placebo patients demonstrated a survival advantage for those receiving sorafenib, suggesting an important cross-over effect. VEGF levels are prognostic for PFS and OS in RCC. The results of TARGET establish the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in advanced RCC.

Written on behalf of the Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET) Study Group.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical Trials repository link available on JCO.org.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Targeting Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Robert J. Motzer and Ana M. Molina
    JCO 2009 27: 3274-3276 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
R. J. Motzer and A. M. Molina
Targeting Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2009; 27(20): 3274 - 3276.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online