Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.4085 on May 26 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 21 (July 20), 2009: pp. 3430-3436
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, L. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dressler, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, L. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dressler, L.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Topoisomerase II{alpha} Amplification Does Not Predict Benefit From Dose-Intense Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Fluorouracil Therapy in HER2-Amplified Early Breast Cancer: Results of CALGB 8541/150013

Lyndsay N. Harris, Gloria Broadwater, Maysa Abu-Khalaf, David Cowan, Ann D. Thor, Daniel Budman, Constance T. Cirrincione, Donald A. Berry, Eric P. Winer, Clifford A. Hudis, Daniel F. Hayes, Paula Friedman, Matthew Ellis, Lynn Dressler

From the Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Duke University, Durham; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; North Shore Hospital Center, Long Island; Memorial Sloane-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Central Office, Chicago, IL; and Washington University, St Louis, MO.

Corresponding author: Lyndsay Harris, MD, 333 Cedar St, WWW 213, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06850; e-mail: lyndsay.harris{at}yale.edu.

Purpose We have demonstrated that patients with HER2-amplified tumors derive more benefit from higher doses of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil [CAF]). Because topoisomerase II{alpha} (Topo-II{alpha}) is a target for doxorubicin and is coamplified in 20% to 50% of HER2-amplified tumors, we postulated that Topo-II{alpha} copy number might account for the benefit from CAF dose escalation in HER2-positive tumors. To address this hypothesis, we examined Topo-II{alpha} and HER2 copy number, CAF dose, and clinical outcomes in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8541.

Patients and Methods Topo-II{alpha} and HER2 copy number were measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using a triple-probe system, which includes Topo-II{alpha}, HER2, and chromosome 17 (CEP17). Topo-II{alpha} and/or HER2 were classified as amplified (≥ two copies/CEP17, deleted (≤ 0.67 copies/CEP17) and normal copy number (> .67 to < 2.0 copies/CEP17).

Results Topo-II{alpha}/HER2/CEP17 measurement was successful in 624 of 687 cases. HER2 was amplified in 117 cases (19%). Topo-II{alpha} was amplified in 41 cases (7%) and deleted in 69 cases (11%). Topo-II{alpha} amplification was highly correlated with HER2 amplification (39 of 41; P < .0001), HER2 by immunohistochemistry, and by dual-probe FISH. Topo-II{alpha} was deleted in both the HER2-amplified (30 of 69; 43%), normal (22 of 69; 32%) and HER2-deleted tumors (17 of 69; 25%). Although Topo-II{alpha}–amplified tumors were nearly always HER2 amplified, these tumors did not receive benefit from increasing the dose of CAF (P = .15).

Conclusion The correlative companion study CALGB 8541-150013 does not support the hypothesis that Topo-II{alpha} amplification is the mechanism behind benefit from increased dose of anthracyclines in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Topoisomerase II{alpha} Amplification and Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: The Jury Is Still Out
    Francisco J. Esteva and Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
    JCO 2009 27: 3416-3417 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
F. J. Esteva and G. N. Hortobagyi
Topoisomerase II{alpha} Amplification and Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: The Jury Is Still Out
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2009; 27(21): 3416 - 3417.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online