Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9692 on August 3 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 27 (September 20), 2009: pp. 4570-4577
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringdén, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ringdén, O.
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Compared With Myeloablative Conditioning Using Unrelated Donor Transplants in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Olle Ringdén, Myriam Labopin, Gerhard Ehninger, Dietger Niederwieser, Richard Olsson, Nadezda Basara, Juergen Finke, Rainer Schwerdtfeger, Matthias Eder, Donald Bunjes, Norbert-Claude Gorin, Mohamad Mohty, Vanderson Rocha

From the Centre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Acute Leukemia Working Party, European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Paris Office, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, and Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine; Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Université de Nantes, Nantes, France; University Hospital Dresden, Dresden; University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig; University of Freiburg, Freiburg; Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Knochenmarktransplantation Zentrum, Wiesbaden; Hannover Medical School, Hannover; and University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Corresponding author: Olle Ringdén, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital, Centre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: olle.ringden{at}labmed.ki.se.

Purpose Reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) is increasingly used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Unrelated donor (UD) transplants have more complications. We wanted to examine if RIC is a valid treatment option using UD in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML).

Patients and Methods Between 1999 and 2005, 401 patients with AML were treated with RIC and 1,154 received myeloablative conditioning (MAC), using UD and reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry. Patients < and ≥ 50 years of age were analyzed separately.

Results Patients receiving RIC were older, received transplants more recently, received peripheral blood stem cells more frequently, and were treated with total-body irradiation less often. In multivariable analysis, in patients younger than 50 years of age, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar using RIC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .41), relapse was increased (HR, 1.46; P = .02) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was the same (HR, 0.88; P = .28), as compared with MAC. In patients ≥ 50 years of age, NRM was decreased in the RIC group (HR, 0.64; P = .04), relapse probability was not significantly different (HR, 1.34; P = .16) and LFS was similar (HR, 1.04; P = .79) compared with MAC.

Conclusion RIC-UD transplants are associated with higher relapse in AML patients younger than 50 years of age and decreased NRM in those ≥ 50 years compared with MAC-UD. LFS was similar after both conditioning regimens, regardless of age. Therefore, RIC-UD extend the use of allotransplants for elderly patients and strategies that decrease relapse should be considered mainly in younger patients with AML.

Supported by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation funds, and grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Children's Cancer Foundation, the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Cancer Society in Stockholm, and Karolinska Institutet.

Written on behalf of the the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
N. Schmitz, A. Sureda, G. Dini, A. Claviez, and on behalf of the Lymphoma and Pediatric Diseases W
Allogeneic transplantation for children and adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma
Blood, November 12, 2009; 114(20): 4605 - 4606.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online