Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1715 on August 31 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 28 (October 1), 2009: pp. 4671-4678
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stitzenberg, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Meropol, N. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stitzenberg, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Meropol, N. J.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Health Services and Outcomes

Centralization of Cancer Surgery: Implications for Patient Access to Optimal Care

Karyn B. Stitzenberg, Elin R. Sigurdson, Brian L. Egleston, Russell B. Starkey, Neal J. Meropol

From the Departments of Surgical Oncology, Biostatistics, and Medical Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center Partners, Fox Chase Cancer Center; and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Corresponding author: Karyn B. Stitzenberg, MD, MPH, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Dr, 1150 POB, CB# 7213, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213; e-mail: kbstitz{at}msn.com.

Purpose The volume-outcomes relationship has led many to advocate centralization of cancer procedures at high volume hospitals (HVH). We hypothesized that in response cancer surgery has become increasingly centralized and that this centralization has resulted in increased travel burden for patients.

Patients and Methods Using 1996 to 2006 discharge data from NY, NJ, PA, all patients ≥ 18 years old treated with extirpative surgery for colorectal, esophageal, or pancreatic cancer were examined. Patients and hospitals were geocoded. Annual hospital procedure volume for each tumor site was examined, and multiple quantile and logistic regressions were used to compare changes in centralization and distance traveled.

Results Five thousand two hundred seventy-three esophageal, 13,472 pancreatic, 202,879 colon, and 51,262 rectal procedures were included. A shift to HVH occurred to varying degrees for all tumor types. The odds of surgery at a low volume hospital decreased for esophagus, pancreas and colon: per year odds ratios (ORs) were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.90), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.87), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97 to 0.98). Median travel distance increased for all sites: esophagus 72%, pancreas 40%, colon 17%, and rectum 28% (P < .0001). Travel distance was proportional to procedure volume (P < .0001). The majority of the increase in distance was attributable to centralization.

Conclusion There has been extensive centralization of complex cancer surgery over the past decade. While this process should result in population-level improvements in cancer outcomes, centralization is increasing patient travel. For some subsets of the population, increasing travel requirements may pose a significant barrier to access to quality cancer care.

Supported by the John A. Ridge, MD, PhD, Surgical Oncology Fellowship at Fox Chase Cancer Center (K.B.S.); and by Grant No. P30 CA 06927 from the National Institutes of Health (B.L.E.). These funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study nor the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, nor the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

  • Centralization of Cancer Surgery: What Does It Mean for Surgical Training?
    Caprice C. Greenberg, Stanley W. Ashley, and Deborah Schrag
    JCO 2009 27: 4637-4639 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
C. C. Greenberg, S. W. Ashley, and D. Schrag
Centralization of Cancer Surgery: What Does It Mean for Surgical Training?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2009; 27(28): 4637 - 4639.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online