Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7075 on August 31 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 28 (October 1), 2009: pp. 4701-4708
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millar, E. K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millar, E. K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prediction of Local Recurrence, Distant Metastases, and Death After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Using a Five-Biomarker Panel

Ewan K.A. Millar, Peter H. Graham, Sandra A. O'Toole, Catriona M. McNeil, Lois Browne, Adrienne L. Morey, Sarah Eggleton, Julia Beretov, Constantine Theocharous, Anne Capp, Elias Nasser, John H. Kearsley, Geoff Delaney, George Papadatos, Christopher Fox, Robert L. Sutherland

From the Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, and Department of Pathology (SydPath), St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst; Department of Anatomical Pathology, South Eastern Area Laboratory Service, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead; Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool; Department of Radiation Oncology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, and University of Western Sydney, Sydney; and Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.

Corresponding author: Ewan K.A. Millar, MD, Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia; e-mail: e.millar{at}garvan.org.au.

Purpose To determine the clinical utility of intrinsic molecular phenotype after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation with or without a cavity boost.

Patients and Methods Four hundred ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized trial of BCT with or without a tumor bed radiation boost. Tumors were classified by intrinsic molecular phenotype as luminal A or B, HER-2, basal-like, or unclassified using a five-biomarker panel: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, CK5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methodology were used to ascertain relationships to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and death from breast cancer.

Results Median follow-up was 84 months. Three hundred ninety-four patients were classified as luminal A, 23 were luminal B, 52 were basal, 13 were HER-2, and 16 were unclassified. There were 24 IBTR (4.8%), 35 LRR (7%), 47 distant metastases (9.4%), and 37 breast cancer deaths (7.4%). The overall 5-year disease-free rates for the whole cohort were: IBTR 97.4%, LRR 95.6%, DDFS 92.9%, and breast cancer–specific death 96.3%. A significant difference was observed for survival between subtypes for LRR (P = .012), DDFS (P = .0035), and breast cancer–specific death (P = .0482), but not for IBTR (P = .346).

Conclusion The 5-year and 10-year survival rates varied according to molecular subtype. Although this approach provides additional information to predict time to IBTR, LRR, DDFS, and death from breast cancer, its predictive power is less than that of traditional pathologic indices. This information may be useful in discussing outcomes and planning management with patients after BCT.

Supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Cancer Institute New South Wales, the Petre Foundation, and the R.T. Hall Trust.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
O. Gluz, C. Liedtke, N. Gottschalk, L. Pusztai, U. Nitz, and N. Harbeck
Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2009; 20(12): 1913 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online