Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467 on September 21 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 31 (November 1), 2009: pp. 5124-5130
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roh, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolmark, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roh, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolmark, N.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Preoperative Multimodality Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-03

Mark S. Roh, Linda H. Colangelo, Michael J. O'Connell, Greg Yothers, Melvin Deutsch, Carmen J. Allegra, Morton S. Kahlenberg, Luis Baez-Diaz, Carol S. Ursiny, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Norman Wolmark

From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Operations Center; Allegheny General Hospital; NSABP Biostatistical Center at the University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Florida, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Gainesville, FL; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program, San Juan, PR; Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE.

Corresponding author: Mark S. Roh, MD, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, 1400 South Orange Blvd, Orlando, FL 32806; e-mail: mark.roh{at}orlandohealth.com.

Purpose Although chemoradiotherapy plus resection is considered standard treatment for operable rectal carcinoma, the optimal time to administer this therapy is not clear. The NSABP R-03 (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-03) trial compared neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

Patients and Methods Patients with clinical T3 or T4 or node-positive rectal cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and leucovorin with 45 Gy in 25 fractions with a 5.40-Gy boost within the original margins of treatment. In the preoperative group, surgery was performed within 8 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. In the postoperative group, chemotherapy began after recovery from surgery but no later than 4 weeks after surgery. The primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results From August 1993 to June 1999, 267 patients were randomly assigned to NSABP R-03. The intended sample size was 900 patients. Excluding 11 ineligible and two eligible patients without follow-up data, the analysis used data on 123 patients randomly assigned to preoperative and 131 to postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Surviving patients were observed for a median of 8.4 years. The 5-year DFS for preoperative patients was 64.7% v 53.4% for postoperative patients (P = .011). The 5-year OS for preoperative patients was 74.5% v 65.6% for postoperative patients (P = .065). A complete pathologic response was achieved in 15% of preoperative patients. No preoperative patient with a complete pathologic response has had a recurrence.

Conclusion Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, compared with postoperative chemoradiotherapy, significantly improved DFS and showed a trend toward improved OS.

See accompanying editorial on page 5115

Supported by Public Health Service Grants No. U10-CA-37377, U10-CA-69974, U10-CA-12027, U10-CA-69651, and U24-CA-114732 from the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: PDQ: NSABP-R-03.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Still the Treatment of Choice for Rectal Cancer?
    Bruce D. Minsky
    JCO 2009 27: 5115-5116 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
B. D. Minsky
Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Still the Treatment of Choice for Rectal Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2009; 27(31): 5115 - 5116.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online