Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1579 on October 13 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 32 (November 10), 2009: pp. 5452-5458
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Day, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Day, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Melanoma

Phase II, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial of Weekly Elesclomol Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Alone for Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma

Steven O'Day, Rene Gonzalez, David Lawson, Robert Weber, Laura Hutchins, Clay Anderson, Jonathan Haddad, Steven Kong, Anthony Williams, Eric Jacobson

From the Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica; St Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO; Emory Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Ellis Fischel Cancer Center/University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and Synta Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA.

Corresponding author: Steven O'Day, MD, Angeles Clinic and Research Institute; 2001 Santa Monica Blvd, Ste 560W; Santa Monica, CA 90404; e-mail: soday{at}theangelesclinic.org.

Purpose Elesclomol is a novel, small-molecule, oxidative stress inducer believed to exert selective cytotoxicity by increasing intracellular concentrations of reactive oxygen species, which results in cell death via mitochondrial apoptosis. We evaluated whether the addition of elesclomol to weekly paclitaxel could improve efficacy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma.

Patients and Methods We randomly assigned patients with metastatic melanoma, measurable disease, and one or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens to elesclomol 213 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (E + P) or to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 alone at a 2:1 ratio; regimens were given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly, during 3 of every 4 weeks until disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or death occurred. Patients who experienced progression were unblended, and patients on paclitaxel alone were permitted to cross over to E + P. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were response rate (RR), toxicity, and overall survival (OS; analyzed post hoc).

Results At 21 US sites, 53 patients were randomly assigned to E + P, and 28 patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel. The addition of elesclomol to paclitaxel yielded a doubling of median PFS (112 v 56 days) and a 41.7% risk reduction for disease progression/death (hazard ratio, 0.583; P = .035). Respective RRs for the E + P and paclitaxel groups were 15% and 3%; median OS was 11.9 v 7.8 months. Of patients on paclitaxel alone, 19 (68%) of 28 crossed over to E + P after they experienced progression. Weekly E + P was well tolerated.

Conclusion E + P resulted in a statistically significant doubling of median PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging OS. A multinational, phase III trial (SYMMETRY) of E + P compared with paclitaxel alone in metastatic melanoma has closed.

Supported by Synta Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA.

Presented in part at the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 30-June 3, 2008, Chicago, IL; the 33rd European Society of Medical Oncology Congress, September 12-16, 2008, Stockholm, Sweden; the 12th Perspectives in Melanoma, October 2-4, 2008, The Hague, the Netherlands; the 1st World Meeting of Interdisciplinary Melanoma/ Skin Cancer Centers, September 5-8, 2007, Barcelona, Spain; the 44th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL; the 11th Perspectives in Melanoma, October 3-4, 2007 Huntington Beach, CA; and the 14th ECCO 14 European Cancer Conference, September 23-27, 2007, Barcelona, Spain.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00084214 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online