Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2646 on December 15 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 4 (February 1), 2009: pp. 526-534
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baselga, J.
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baselga, J.
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phase II Genomics Study of Ixabepilone as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer

José Baselga, Milvia Zambetti, Antoni Llombart-Cussac, Georgy Manikhas, Ernst Kubista, Günther G. Steger, Anatoly Makhson, Sergei Tjulandin, Heinz Ludwig, Mark Verrill, Eva Ciruelos, Suzanne Egyhazi, Li-An Xu, Kim E. Zerba, Hyerim Lee, Edwin Clark, Susan Galbraith

From the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Hospital Universitario Arnau Vilanova, Lleida; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octobre, Madrid, Spain; Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; St Petersburg City Oncology Hospital, St Petersburg; Moscow Oncological Hospital No. 62; Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation; Medical University of Vienna; Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria; University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Clinical Discovery, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton, NJ.

Corresponding author: José Baselga, MD, Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, P. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: jbaselga{at}vhebron.net.

Purpose This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone as neoadjuvant therapy for invasive breast cancer not amenable to breast conservation surgery. Gene expression studies were undertaken using genes that were identified as potentially associated with sensitivity/resistance to ixabepilone in prior preclinical investigations.

Patients and Methods Patients with invasive breast cancer ≥ 3 cm were eligible. Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for four or fewer cycles.

Results One hundred sixty-one patients were treated. The overall complete pathologic response (pCR) rate was 18% in breast and 29% in estrogen receptor (ER) –negative patients. Gene expression data were available for 134 patients. ER gene expression (ER1) was inversely related to pCR in breast and had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 37% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92%. A 10-gene penalized logistic regression (PLR) model developed from 200 genes predictive of ixabepilone sensitivity in preclinical experiments included ER and tau and had higher PPV (45%) and comparable NPV (89%) to ER1. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported for 32% of patients. Except for neutropenia and leukopenia, all grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in ≤ 3% of patients. Reversible peripheral neuropathy was experienced by 3% of patients.

Conclusion ER, microtubule-associated protein tau, and a 10-gene PLR model that included ER were identified as predictors of ixabepilone-induced pCR. Results indicate an inverse relation between ER expression levels and ixabepilone sensitivity. Neoadjuvant ixabepilone demonstrated promising activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with invasive breast tumors.

Supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb. The authors vouch for the completeness and accuracy of results presented.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Goldhirsch, J. N. Ingle, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, B. Thurlimann, H.-J. Senn, and Panel members
Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2009; 20(8): 1319 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online