Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4864 on December 29 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 5 (February 10), 2009: pp. 699-705
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rodin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rodin, G.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Right arrowRelated Editorials
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Palliative and Supportive Care

Predictors of Referral for Specialized Psychosocial Oncology Care in Patients With Metastatic Cancer: The Contributions of Age, Distress, and Marital Status

Janet Ellis, Judy Lin, Andrew Walsh, Christopher Lo, Frances A. Shepherd, Malcolm Moore, Madeline Li, Lucia Gagliese, Camilla Zimmermann, Gary Rodin

From the Departments of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital; Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Research Division, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network; Behavioural Sciences and Health Research Division, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network; University of Toronto; and the Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Corresponding author: Gary Rodin, MD, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, 16th Floor, Room 724, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9 Canada; e-mail: gary.rodin{at}uhn.on.ca.

Purpose This study examines the rate and prediction of referral for specialized psychosocial oncology care in 326 patients with metastatic GI or lung cancer.

Patients and Methods Referral information was abstracted from medical records and hospital databases. Patients completed measures of psychosocial and physical distress and functioning.

Results Routine referral occurred in 33% of patients, and in 42% and 44%, respectively, of those scoring high on measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]-II ≥ 15) and hopelessness (Beck Hopelessness Scale ≥ 8). Univariate analyses indicated that referral was associated with younger age, unmarried status, living alone, presence of more depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and attachment anxiety, and with less social support, self-esteem, and spiritual well-being (all P < .05). Among the significantly depressed (BDI-II ≥ 15), 100% of those less than 40 years of age, but only 22% of those age 70 years or older were referred. Multivariate analyses indicated that referral was associated with younger age, unmarried status, and presence of more depressive symptoms. Moreover, increasing age was associated with a progressively lower likelihood of referral independent of the level of distress.

Conclusion Routine referral of patients with metastatic cancer for psychosocial oncology care was predicted by presence of more severe depressive symptoms, younger age, and unmarried status. The rate of referral progressively declined with each decade of age, even among those with significant distress. These findings are consistent with some aspects of Andersen's model of health care utilization. The extent to which referred patients represent those who are most likely to benefit deserves further investigation.

Supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR Grant No. MOP-62861; G.R.) and York University (L.G.), and by the Edith Kirchmann Fellowship from Princess Margaret Hospital (C.L.).

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Behavioral Health Services for Women Who Have Breast Cancer
    Vanessa Azzone, Richard G. Frank, Juliana R. Pakes, Craig C. Earle, and Michael J. Hassett
    JCO 2009 27: 706-712 [Abstract] [Full Text]

Related Editorials

  • Predictors of Referral for Psychosocial Services: Recommendations From the Institute of Medicine Report—Cancer Care for the Whole Patient
    Carol L. Alter
    JCO 2009 27: 659-660 [Full Text]
  • Barriers to the Delivery of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Patients: Bridging Mind and Body
    Harold Alan Pincus and Sapana R. Patel
    JCO 2009 27: 661-662 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
C. L. Alter
Predictors of Referral for Psychosocial Services: Recommendations From the Institute of Medicine Report--Cancer Care for the Whole Patient
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2009; 27(5): 659 - 660.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online