Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3006 on December 29 2008

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 5 (February 10), 2009: pp. 706-712
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azzone, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azzone, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, M. J.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Right arrowRelated Editorials
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Behavioral Health Services for Women Who Have Breast Cancer

Vanessa Azzone, Richard G. Frank, Juliana R. Pakes, Craig C. Earle, Michael J. Hassett

From the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School; and Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Metro Center for Urban Education, Steinhardt School of Education, New York University, New York, NY.

Corresponding author: Vanessa Azzone, PhD, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: azzone{at}hcp.med.harvard.edu.

Purpose To explore whether the use of behavioral health services (BHS) among women with breast cancer is influenced by how insurance plans administer these services, we compared utilization of psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic medications among women with breast cancer who received BHS coverage through a carve-out versus integrated arrangement.

Patients and Methods We analyzed insurance claims, enrollment data, and benefit design data from the MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters Research Database for the years 1998 to 2002 for women ≤ 63 years old with newly diagnosed breast cancer. We compared the probability of receiving psychotherapy, the likelihood of receiving antidepressant/antianxiety/hypnotic medications, and the number of psychotherapy sessions used during the year after a breast cancer diagnosis among women whose behavioral health services were provided through carve-out versus integrated arrangements.

Results Women enrolled in carve-outs were significantly less likely to receive any psychotherapy visits compared with women in integrated arrangements (odds ratio, 0.68; P < .01). Conditional on having received psychotherapy, however, women in carve-out arrangements used more psychotherapy visits than women in integrated arrangements. The use of antianxiety/hypnotic drugs was significantly higher for women in carve-out arrangements versus women in integrated arrangements (36.1% v 32.6%, P < .05). Moreover, women who received psychotherapy were significantly more likely to received antidepressants and antianxiety/hypnotic medications (five and three times more likely, respectively).

Conclusion The type of BHS arrangement was associated with the utilization of psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic medications among women with breast cancer.

Supported by Grant No. PO1 HS10803-03 (Structuring Markets and Competition in Health Care) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Predictors of Referral for Specialized Psychosocial Oncology Care in Patients With Metastatic Cancer: The Contributions of Age, Distress, and Marital Status
    Janet Ellis, Judy Lin, Andrew Walsh, Christopher Lo, Frances A. Shepherd, Malcolm Moore, Madeline Li, Lucia Gagliese, Camilla Zimmermann, and Gary Rodin
    JCO 2009 27: 699-705 [Abstract] [Full Text]

Related Editorials

  • Predictors of Referral for Psychosocial Services: Recommendations From the Institute of Medicine Report—Cancer Care for the Whole Patient
    Carol L. Alter
    JCO 2009 27: 659-660 [Full Text]
  • Barriers to the Delivery of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Patients: Bridging Mind and Body
    Harold Alan Pincus and Sapana R. Patel
    JCO 2009 27: 661-662 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
H. A. Pincus and S. R. Patel
Barriers to the Delivery of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Patients: Bridging Mind and Body
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2009; 27(5): 661 - 662.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online