Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4202 on January 21 2009

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 27, No 8 (March 10), 2009: pp. 1297-1303
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by de Camargo, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by de Camargo, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pediatric Oncology

Cisplatin and Etoposide in Childhood Germ Cell Tumor: Brazilian Pediatric Oncology Society Protocol GCT-91

Luiz Fernando Lopes, Carla Renata Pacheco Macedo, Elitânia Marinho Pontes, Simone dos Santos Aguiar, Maria José Mastellaro, Renato Melaragno, Sonia Maria Rossi Vianna, Paula Azevedo Allemand Lopes, Nubia Mendonça, Maria Teresa de Assis Almeida, Viviane Sonaglio, Karina B. Ribeiro, Victor M. Santana, Dominik T. Schneider, Beatriz de Camargo

From the Brazilian Germ Cell Tumour Study Group of the Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Pediátrica, Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer; Instituto de Oncologia Pediatrica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Hospital Santa Marcelina; Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual; and Instituto da Criança, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo; Grupo de Pediatria Oncologica, São Jose dos Campos; Centro Infantil Boldrini, Campinas; Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasilia; and Clinica Onco, Salvador, Brazil; Departement of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; and Clinic of Pediatrics, Dortmund, Germany.

Corresponding author: Luiz Fernando Lopes, MD, PhD, Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Pediátrica, Av Moema, 94 cj 31, Cep 04077-020 São Paulo-SP, Brasil; e-mail: lf.lopes{at}yahoo.com.

Purpose In 1988, we formed a consortium of Brazilian institutions to develop uniform standards for the diagnostic assessment and multidisciplinary treatment of children and adolescents with germ cell tumors. We also implemented the first childhood Brazilian germ cell tumor protocol, GCT-91, evaluating two-agent chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide (PE). We now report on the clinical characteristics and survival of children and adolescents with germ cell tumors treated on this protocol.

Patients and Methods From May 1991 to April 2000, 115 patients (106 assessable patients) were enrolled onto the Brazilian protocol with a diagnosis of germ cell tumor.

Results Patients were treated with surgery only (n = 35) and chemotherapy (n = 71). Important prognostic factors included stage (P = .025), surgical procedure at diagnosis according to resectability (P < .032), and abnormal lactate dehydrogenase value at diagnosis (P < .001).

Conclusion The improvement in survival by the introduction of a standard protocol is an important achievement. This is of particular importance for smaller institutions with previous limited experience in the treatment of childhood germ cell tumors. In addition, the results of a two-agent regimen with PE were favorable (5-year overall survival rate is 83.3% for patients in the high-risk group [n = 36] who received PE v 58.8% for patients in the high-risk patients group who received PE plus ifosfamide, vinblastine, and bleomycin [n = 17; P = .017]). Thus for selected patients, complex three-agent regimens may not be necessary to achieve long-term survival, even for some patients with advanced disease.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online