Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1684 on February 17 2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Publisher's Note Erratum (v27,p2305) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bookman, M. A. Articles by Roth, L. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bookman, M. A. Articles by Roth, L. M. Related Articles Related Editorial Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Evaluation of New Platinum-Based Treatment Regimens in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center, Buffalo, NY; Franklin Square Hospital; Baltimore, MD; Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, Australia; European Institute of Cancer Research, Milano, Italy; Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; University College London and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Corresponding author: Michael A. Bookman, MD, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, W41, Philadelphia, PA 19111 michael.bookman{at}fccc.edu.

Purpose To determine if incorporation of an additional cytotoxic agent improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Patients and Methods Women with stages III to IV disease were stratified by coordinating center, maximal diameter of residual tumor, and intent for interval cytoreduction and were then randomly assigned among five arms that incorporated gemcitabine, methoxypolyethylene glycosylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The primary end point was OS and was determined by pairwise comparison to the reference arm, with a 90% chance of detecting a true hazard ratio of 1.33 that limited type I error to 5% (two-tail) for the four comparisons.

Results Accrual exceeded 1,200 patients per year. An event-triggered interim analysis occurred after 272 events on the reference arm, and the study closed with 4,312 women enrolled. Arms were well balanced for demographic and prognostic factors, and 79% of patients completed eight cycles of therapy. There were no improvements in either PFS or OS associated with any experimental regimen. Survival analyses of groups defined by size of residual disease also failed to show experimental benefit in any subgroup.

Conclusion Compared with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin, addition of a third cytotoxic agent provided no benefit in PFS or OS after optimal or suboptimal cytoreduction. Dual-stage, multiarm, phase III trials can efficiently evaluate multiple experimental regimens against a single reference arm. The development of new interventions beyond surgery and conventional platinum-based chemotherapy is required to additionally improve outcomes for women with advanced EOC.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants No. CA 27469 to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office and CA 37517 to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center. ICON5 was funded by the MRC and has been supported by the NCRN through Grant No. ISRCTN 41636183.

Presented in part at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 2-6, 2006, Atlanta, GA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related Editorial

• Triple Cytotoxic Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Failed Application, Not a Failed Strategy
  Paul J. Hoskins
  JCO 2009 27: 1355-1358 [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. McMeekin Where is the future of endometrial cancer therapy? Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1757 - 1761. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Trimble, J. S. Abrams, R. M. Meyer, F. Calvo, E. Cazap, J. Deye, E. Eisenhauer, T. J. Fitzgerald, D. Lacombe, M. Parmar, et al. Improving Cancer Outcomes Through International Collaboration in Academic Cancer Treatment Trials J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2009; 27(30): 5109 - 5114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Hoskins Triple Cytotoxic Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Failed Application, Not a Failed Strategy J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1355 - 1358. [Full Text] [PDF]