Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maddox, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freireich, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maddox, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freireich, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 3, 799-808, Copyright © 1985 by American Society of Clinical Oncology


ARTICLES

DNA-RNA measurements in patients with acute leukemia undergoing remission induction therapy

AM Maddox, DA Johnston, B Barlogie, E Youness, M Keating and EJ Freireich

Prior to therapy, 111 newly diagnosed adult patients with acute leukemia had DNA content measured (cell-cycle distributions) and 91 had RNA content measured using flow cytometry of acridine orange-stained bone marrow biopsies. The RNA index (RI) (ratio of mean RNA in G0/G1 of the sample to the median RNA in G0/G1 of normal lymphocytes) distinguished acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) from acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). The mean RI in AML was 2.2 and in ALL 1.5. RI did not predict for achievement of complete remission (CR). In AML the mean S- phase percent was 11.2 in patients who achieved CR and 13.1 in those who failed to respond to therapy, whereas in ALL it was 14.5 in those responding and 8.0 in those not responding (P = .02). In the 77 patients with either AML or ALL who achieved CR, a low pretreatment S- phase percent and a high RI correlated with a long duration of CR. S- phase percent and RI were also measured during remission induction and during maintenance therapy. Between days 8 and 18, the RI of responders decreased. In both AML and ALL an increase in S-phase percent between days 18 and 22, prior to morphological CR, was observed in responders but not in nonresponders. The mean S-phase percent at the time of morphological remission was 17.3. A high S-phase percent at this time correlated with a longer duration of CR. Although neither pretreatment S-phase percent nor RI was found to predict for achievement of CR in AML, both predicted for length of CR. Increases in S-phase percent during therapy indicated recovery of normal hematopoiesis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online