Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 5, 1928-1932, Copyright © 1987 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

ARTICLES

The effect on survival of initial chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: polychemotherapy versus single drug

DL Ahmann, DJ Schaid, HF Bisel, RG Hahn, JH Edmonson and JN Ingle
Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

Since current clinical trials assessing new agents occur in patients with advanced breast cancer having failed one and sometimes many polychemotherapy programs, these new agents may not be given a fair trial. In an effort to assess the possibility of using an alternative study design, we analyzed older clinical trials that used a controlled study design, randomizing between a single new drug and an established polychemotherapy program with a cross-over design upon failure. We were interested in noting that the pooled data did display a slight survival advantage (median 3.7 months) for the group receiving polychemotherapy as initial therapy. The survival distributions were clearly not significant using the log rank test, but did approach significance using the Smirnov. It is apparent that, while some slight advantage does occur for that group of patients receiving initial polychemotherapy, the magnitude of this effect is not great and is short in duration. Serious consideration should be given to the assessment of new agents as first-line therapy, particularly should they have a unique mode of action or lessened morbidities or toxicities.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Mauri, N. P. Polyzos, G. Salanti, N. Pavlidis, and J. P. A. Ioannidis Multiple-Treatments Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Advanced Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1780 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Colozza, E. de Azambuja, N. Personeni, F. Lebrun, M. J. Piccart, and F. Cardoso Achievements in Systemic Therapies in the Pregenomic Era in Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 253 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Overmoyer Combination Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Reaching for the Cure J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2003; 21(4): 580 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Sledge, D. Neuberg, P. Bernardo, J. N. Ingle, S. Martino, E. K. Rowinsky, and W. C. Wood Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and the Combination of Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel as Front-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Intergroup Trial (E1193) J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2003; 21(4): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fossati, C. Confalonieri, G. Apolone, S. Cavuto, and S. Garattini Does a drug do better when it is new? Ann. Onc., March 1, 2002; 13(3): 470 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Norris, K. I. Pritchard, K. James, J. Myles, K. Bennett, S. Marlin, J. Skillings, B. Findlay, T. Vandenberg, P. Goss, et al. Phase III Comparative Study of Vinorelbine Combined With Doxorubicin Versus Doxorubicin Alone in Disseminated Metastatic/Recurrent Breast Cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8 J. Clin. Oncol., June 12, 2000; 18(12): 2385 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Smith, J. Abrams, E. L. Trimble, and R. S. Ungerleider Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy for Childhood Cancers Oncologist, October 1, 1996; 1(5): 293 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]