Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 5, 1952-1959, Copyright © 1987 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Sequential cisplatin/VM-26 and vincristine/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin in metastatic neuroblastoma: an effective alternating non-cross- resistant regimen?
JL Bernard, T Philip, JM Zucker, D Frappaz, A Robert, G Margueritte, A Boilletot, N Philippe, P Lutz and H Roche
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hopital d'Enfants de la Timone, Marseille, France.
We report the results of a French multicentric pilot study of remission
induction therapy in metastatic neuroblastoma. Thirty-five successive
unselected patients entered the study over 1 year and were treated by
alternating sequences of cisplatin/VM-26 (PE) and
vincristine/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin (CADO). Three courses of each
sequence were delivered. Disease reevaluation was extensive, with special
focus on bone marrow status. Using strict criteria, 24 patients (68%)
achieved a good partial response (GPR), which comprised normalization of
bone marrow, and ten (28%) achieved a partial response (PR), and one
progressed. The overall response rate was 96%. Thirty-two patients
underwent surgery, and complete macroscopic removal of the primary was
achieved in 21 (65%). After completion of induction and surgery, six
patients (17%) were in complete remission (CRm), without evidence of any
residual disease; nine (26%) were in very good partial remission (VGPRm;
same as CRm except persistence of nonpathologically evaluable improved bone
scan), and 19 (51%) were in partial remission (PRm). Toxicity was
acceptable, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. These results show no
substantial improvement compared with those previously reported with
similar but nonalternating regimens. We advocate a two-category concept
(response, remission) to describe initial therapy results in metastatic
neuroblastoma and emphasize the need to assess bone marrow by an extensive
evaluation.